Stress energy tensor interpretation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the interpretation of Einstein's stress-energy tensor within the context of general relativity (GR). Participants express a desire for clearer explanations of the tensor's physical implications, particularly in relation to momentum flux and negative pressure. They seek comparisons between the stress-energy tensors in GR, special relativity, and electromagnetic theory, as well as insights into the historical development of these concepts. Recommended resources include Kip Thorne's "Black Holes and Time Warps" and a NASA document on tensors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's general relativity principles
  • Familiarity with stress-energy tensor concepts in physics
  • Basic knowledge of electromagnetic theory
  • Awareness of fluid dynamics and its relation to momentum flux
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical development of the stress-energy tensor in general relativity
  • Explore the differences between stress-energy tensors in general relativity and electromagnetic theory
  • Study the implications of negative pressure in cosmology and gravitational theories
  • Investigate experimental verifications of gravitational self-interaction and pressure effects
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of general relativity, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of gravitational theory and the physical interpretations of tensors.

Naty1
Messages
5,605
Reaction score
40
I'd appreciate any explanations of the physical interpretations of Einstein's stress energy tensor...for general relativity...maybe a favorite explanatory/expository online source. Wikipedia is not very satisfying on this nor on the electromagnetic stress energy tensor. For example all involve momentum flux (flow) I think.


It would be really interesting to see an explanatory description comparing special and general relativity tensors and also how those formulations differs from an analogous one for electromagnetic waves. Maybe even a comparison to the one(s) use in mechanical engineering.

I get the concept that Einstein somehow included not only mass in his formalism but also stress and energy including negative pressure...Anybody have any historical information of where that all came from?? I've read a lot of books about physics but have seen only hints.
Figuring our his "equivalence principle" is understandable but how did he ever formulate all the components in his GR equations?

I've gathered some good information sources from online regarding the mathematical formalism of tensors (I posted those in the Learning section here) and the stress energy tensor for GR...for summer reading...but I'd really like to get some physical interpretations before attempting to study all that on my own...

I'm actually less interested in the mathematical formalism than explanatory descriptions of the stress energy tensor for GR descriptions since I doubt that even if I get a solid understanding of the formalism on my own (somewhat doubtful!) I'd likely be able to even remotely approach the interpretations of experts over the last 85 years or so. I'm happy to study the insights of others.

I do have BLACK HOLES AND TIME WARPS BY Kip Thorne for reading as that was a recommended reference somewhere here on physics forums...for GR. Thanks for any feedback.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Naty1

I thought the following was a good introduction to Stress Energy Tensors-

http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/Numbers/Math/documents/Tensors_TM2002211716.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes it is good, but how did Einstein relate gravity to a tensor?? If fluid dynamics reflected momentum flux and pressure at the time of Einstein's work I guess it's not so incredible that he included something for gravity.

I'm wondering if the physical insights Einstein was so famous for led him in the right direction towards the stress energy tensor or whether he used such a formalism because he saw it in fluid dynamics or maybe Maxwell's electromagnetic formulation...

Has the pressure aspect of gravity been experimentally verified? How do we know gravity IS self interacting...has that been experimentally verified?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K