Recent content by Abigale

  1. A

    Graduate Do wave-packets of Blochwaves spread over time?

    Hi sure, in Ashcroft Mermin "Solid State Physics". Chapter 12 "Description of the Semiclassical Model" deals with the description of electrons by wave packets of Bloch Electrons. Would be nice if you could explain me if it also spreads...
  2. A

    Graduate Do wave-packets of Blochwaves spread over time?

    Hi, to describe electronic transport and for example bloch oscillations, one uses a wave-packet build of bloch waves (with a band index n and an effective mass m*). Do these wave-packets of blochwaves also spread (disperse) over time?
  3. A

    Undergrad Potential ##V## and potential energy ##E_{pot}##?

    Hi, I know that in an elecric field the potential energy ##E_{pot}## is equal to the potential ##V## times the charge ##E_{pot}=q V##. Here my problem: I know that the potential energy of a spring is ##E_{pot}= \frac{1}{2}kx^2##. In my theoretical physics book i read also that the potential is...
  4. A

    Graduate Why is ##\omega_c \tau >>1## for several revolutions?

    Okay thank you, makes sense. But I would write larger than ##>>2 \pi## to denote to get more than one revolution.
  5. A

    Graduate Why is ##\omega_c \tau >>1## for several revolutions?

    Hey, I read about charge carriers in semiconductors in a magnetic field. They write that for several revolutions ##\omega_c \tau >>1## holds. But I think for one revolution it is ##\omega_c \tau = 2 \pi##. (##\tau## is the scattering time) Why they do not write ##\omega_c \tau >> 2 \pi##...
  6. A

    Graduate Conductivity and Integration over Fermi-Sphere?

    I don't understand the notation ##dS_E##. $$d\bf{k} = k^2 sin\theta d\theta d\phi dk$$ $$ = dS_k dk_\bot $$ This means a surface-element times a radial distance-element perpendicular to the surface-element. Both in k-space. In the book instead of ##dS_k## the expression ##dS_E## is...
  7. A

    Graduate Conductivity and Integration over Fermi-Sphere?

    Hi, I am reading "An Introduction of Solid State Physics" from Ibach Lüth and don't understand the integration process. They write $$\sigma=\frac{e^2}{8\pi^3 \hbar} \int df_{E}dE \frac{v^2_x(\bf{k})}{v(\bf{k})} \tau(\bf{k}) \delta(E-E_F) $$ $$ = \int_{E=E_F}^{}df_{E}...
  8. A

    Graduate Difference between Hubbard and Heisenberg-model

    Hi, I read a chapter about the Heisenberg-model, and then something about the Hubbard-Model. The Heisenberg-model just shows, that neighbouring spins allign antiparallel if J<0. The Hubbard-Model says, that there is a hopping probability t and an Coulomb replsion, so that a material becomes...
  9. A

    Graduate Hund's rule and strong spin-orbit interacion

    Hi, I have read that Hund's rules are valid for Atoms with low z. Because the third Hund's rule is build of Russell-Saunders coupling. Can I still use the first and second Hund's rule for heavy atoms and jj-coupling( for the third rule)? Or how can I know the groundstate for an atom with large...
  10. A

    Graduate Difference of Hydrogen Hamiltonian with relative mass particles

    Hi guys, I consider the qm-derivation of the electronic states of hydrogen. There are two different derivations (I consider only the coulomb-force): 1) the proton is very heavy, so one can neglect the movement 2) the proton moves a little bit, so one uses the relative mass ##\mu## The...
  11. A

    High School Strange Miller Index Notation [00.1]

    Do someone knows what this dot "." means? I just know this notation [001]. Thank u Abigale
  12. A

    Graduate Good explanation for Soliton and Skyrmion?

    I am looking for a Book in which Solitons and Skyrmions are easy explained. I want to understand them for Solid State Physics. Thank U Abby
  13. A

    Graduate What is the magnitude of the relativistic wave-vector?

    Hey guys, I regard a relativistic vector: $$ k^\mu =(k^0,k^1,k^2,k^3,)=(\frac{\omega_k}{c}, \vec{k} ) $$ What is |\vec{k}| of this vector? Is it the same as k^0? THX
  14. A

    Graduate Is the product rule on operators different from traditional calculus?

    Hey Guys, I regard two operators \Psi , \Phi , that don't commute. Does the product-rule, looks like that? $$\nabla (\Phi \Psi) = \Psi (\nabla \Phi) +\Phi (\nabla \Psi) $$ THX
  15. A

    Graduate Commutation of time derrivative

    I regard a Klein-Gordon-field. But for the Klein-Gordon-Field, the commutation-relation is $$ [\Psi^\dagger (x,t), \partial_t \Psi (x',t)] = -i\hbar\delta(r-r')$$ I even know that: $$ [\Psi^\dagger(x,t), \Psi (x',t)] = 0$$ and $$ [\partial_t\Psi^\dagger(x,t), \partial_t \Psi (x',t)] = 0$$ and...