A Conductivity and Integration over Fermi-Sphere?

Abigale
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am reading "An Introduction of Solid State Physics" from Ibach Lüth and don't understand the integration process.
They write $$\sigma=\frac{e^2}{8\pi^3 \hbar}
\int df_{E}dE \frac{v^2_x(\bf{k})}{v(\bf{k})} \tau(\bf{k}) \delta(E-E_F)
$$

$$
= \int_{E=E_F}^{}df_{E} \frac{v^2_x(\bf{k})}{v(\bf{k})} \tau(\bf{k})
$$

But why does ## k ## NOT become ##k_F## after the Integration of the Delta-function?

I would think that the integral becomes immedately after the dE-integration:
$$
= \int_{E=E_F}^{}df_{E} \frac{v^2_x(\bf{k_F})}{v(\bf{k_F})} \tau(\bf{k_F})
$$

THX
Abbi

I also add the pages

Versuch.png
 

Attachments

  • Versuch.png
    Versuch.png
    107.2 KB · Views: 585
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are right, but this is only a matter of notation. k is still a vector and will have different length for different directions as long as the Fermi surface is not spherical.
 
I don't understand the notation ##dS_E##.
$$d\bf{k} = k^2 sin\theta d\theta d\phi dk$$
$$ = dS_k dk_\bot $$ This means a surface-element times a radial distance-element perpendicular to the surface-element. Both in k-space.

In the book instead of ##dS_k## the expression ##dS_E## is used. They say ##dS_k= dS_E dk_\bot ##

What means exactly ##dS_E##?
If I think at the notation $$ dS_k= k^2 sin\theta d\theta d\phi$$,
it should be $$dS_E=E({\bf k})^2 sin\theta d\theta d\phi$$

But then the units don't correspond anymore to k-space:
$$d{\bf k} =dS_E dk_\bot$$ which corresponds to $$ \frac{1}{m^3}=\frac{eV}{1}\frac{1}{m}$$
 
Last edited:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top