Recent content by ParoxysmX
-
P
What is the Constant λ in the Wave Equation for Normalising the Wavefunction?
If the function doesn't contain any complex exponentials, then \psi^{*} is the same as \psi, isn't it?- ParoxysmX
- Post #3
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
What is the Constant λ in the Wave Equation for Normalising the Wavefunction?
Homework Statement Determine the constant λ in the wave equation \Psi(x) = C(2a^2 x^2 + \lambda)e^{-(a^2 x^2/2)} where a=\sqrt{mω/\hbar} Homework Equations Some standard integrals I guess The Attempt at a Solution So I believe the wave equation just needs to be normalised...- ParoxysmX
- Thread
- Normalisation Wavefunction
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Relation between units of attenuation
Ah yes this makes sense, thanks tiny-tim!- ParoxysmX
- Post #10
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Relation between units of attenuation
Yeah ok, so this essentially comes down to a conversion between bases. ##\αlpha(dB/km)## should equal ##2303 \αlpha(m−1)## if you account for the difference between metres and kilometres, shouldn't it?- ParoxysmX
- Post #6
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Relation between units of attenuation
Where does \lambda come into it? Is that simply the wavelength of the light entering the fibre? My question sheet definitely says ##\alpha(dB/km) = 4343\alpha(m^{-1})##. e; I see that ##P_{out} = P_{in}e^{-\lambda L}## is the same as the version we were taught where ##P_{out} = P_{in}e^{-\alpha...- ParoxysmX
- Post #4
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Relation between units of attenuation
Homework Statement It is customary to express fibre loss in units of dB/km: \alpha(dB/km) = \frac{10log(P_{in}/P_{out})}{L(km)} where P_{in} is the power entering the fibre and P_{out} is the power leaving the fibre. Show that \alpha(dB/km) = 4343\alpha(m^{-1}) The Attempt at a Solution...- ParoxysmX
- Thread
- Attenuation Relation Units
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Sharp values of wavefunction in polar coordinates
Homework Statement Consider the function in polar coordinates ψ(r,θ,\phi) = R(r)sinθe^{i\phi} Show by direct calculation that ψ returns sharp values of the magnitude and z-component of the orbital angular momentum for any radial function R(r). What are these sharp values? The Attempt at a...- ParoxysmX
- Thread
- Coordinates Polar Polar coordinates Sharp Wavefunction
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Volume of two pieces of a sphere cut by a plane
Ok I believe I have that one figured out. The next problem now is to calculate the surface area of those segments using spherical coordinates. I'm told the formula S = \int^{b}_{\phi=a}\int^{d}_{\theta=c} sin\theta d\theta d\phi should be used. What are a, b, c and d here?- ParoxysmX
- Post #7
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
P
Find Mass and C.O.M using a line integral
Hah, physics 211 I assume?- ParoxysmX
- Post #3
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
P
Volume of two pieces of a sphere cut by a plane
Volume. Edited accordingly.- ParoxysmX
- Post #3
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
P
Volume of two pieces of a sphere cut by a plane
Homework Statement Consider the unit sphere x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2} = 1 Find the volume of the two pieces of the sphere when the sphere is cut by a plane at z=a.The Attempt at a Solution My interpretation is that a is a point on the z-axis that the plane cuts at. So the height of the segment...- ParoxysmX
- Thread
- Cut Plane Sphere Volume
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
P
Electric and magnetic field problems (curl/divergence)
Ah I see. Thanks for your help.- ParoxysmX
- Post #3
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
P
Electric and magnetic field problems (curl/divergence)
Homework Statement Consider the electric field E(t,x,y,z) = Acos(ky-wt)k 1. Find a magnetic field such that \partial_tB + \nabla X E = 0 2. Show that \nabla . E = 0 and \nabla. B = 0 3. Find a relationship between k and w that enables these fields to satisfy \nabla X B =...- ParoxysmX
- Thread
- Electric Field Magnetic Magnetic field
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
P
Parametric curve /derivative problems
Ah yes, my mistake. So this should mean that dx/dt does not exist at t=0, since \frac{1}{3}t^{-2/3}j becomes 1/0, giving i + ∞j. Yeah. dx/ds in this case would be defined at s=0, which is what we want. Is this sort of like 'moving' the origin?- ParoxysmX
- Post #3
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
P
Parametric curve /derivative problems
Homework Statement Consider the parametric curve given by the equation x(t) = ti + t^(1/3)j1. Calculate x'(t). Does the vector exist at t=0? 2. Find a new parametrisation of the curve for which the tangent vector is well defined at all points. What is the value of the vector at the origin?The...- ParoxysmX
- Thread
- Curve Parametric
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help