Recent content by schiz0ai

Thanks for the replies, i really appreciate it.

What if you would be able to jump into a hole in the ground that went straight trough the middle of the earth. And what IF The tunnel stays intact, You don't fry to death, You don't suffocate, You don't hit the walls, etc Would you yoyo? Would you be compressed badly? Would you be...

i thought the radius of the universe was the speed of light times the time since the big bang, and asumed herefor it had a calculatable center, but something tells me i really need to do some serious years of school to understand that kinda stuff. And hopefully some day il get the time to dive...

Thanks for the info about plants, i didnt know exactly how they worked.

so does that mean that when we think we shot something at 90% speed of light. That seen from the center of the universe, the Earth was moving so fast to begin with, that the thing we shot went only little bit faster?

If there was a device that could convert heat into chemical/electrical energy at a decent rate, even at "relatively low" temperatures. The heat would still flow from hot to the colder(device). But the exact moment a bit of heat is converted into a chemical bond, the temperature difference...

So its possible for normal light waves to be converted into chemical energy by plants, but not for infra red spectrum? Where is this so called "wavelength" point where suddenly light can or can no longer be converted? Give me a number if possible, and please keep it theoretical.

how fast would light travel from 1 rocket to the other? and compared to what? the earth? the rocket emitting the light? or the one receiving it?

so would an observer standing on 1 rocket be able to see light coming from the other rocket?

im not talking about the sun, i mean the refrigerators heat sink becoming hot enough to radiate light that can be converted by the plant/solarcell

Is speed of light relative to "eather" flow? If 2 rockets fly from Earth in opposite directions. Both end up flying at 60% the speed of light. Does that mean they flay faster then the speed of light, compared to each other? Or is it relative to spacetime or eather or whatever?

If in theory there was a very efficient and powerfull refrigerator. Is it possible that a plant/solar panel could turn that heat into usuable energy, faster then what the frige uses up?

im sorry, i thought gravity depended on rotation speed. I figured it out after googling some.

the amount of gravity a planet has depends on its mass and rotation speed right? Of course its impossible for a single object to start rotating faster on its own. But if it does this by makin another object rotate faster in the opposite direction, it should in theory be possible. Would...

Forgive me, for i do not have any degrees in physics.:shy: If 1 large object like a planet were to orbit near another large planet/moon. It would in theory be possible for both objects to increase their speed of rotation, as long as they end up rotating in opposite directions right? Of course...