Recent content by zandbera

  1. Z

    Motion of a Charged Particle in an Electric Field

    Okay yeah for (b) I did what I thought, I used E = 9.60 x 10^3, then multiplied by +e, divided by mass of proton to get a, then used delta x = Vi t + 1/2 a t^2 with Vi = 0, and i got 5.68 mm, the correct answer. So then for (c), the horizontal component is just the initial horizontal velocity...
  2. Z

    Motion of a Charged Particle in an Electric Field

    (b) From the equation and my given data, is qE = 9.60 x 10^3 N/C or is it just E = 9.60 x 10^3? If it's E = 9.60 x 10^3, I would just multiply by (+e) to get qE and then divide by the mass of a proton, right?
  3. Z

    Is Coulomb's Law the Correct Equation for This Calculation?

    Yeah that's where the problem was. If I use # of electrons = 1.8 x 10^28, then take 1% of that, then multiply that by 1.602 x 10^-19 to convert to Coulombs, square that value, multiply by k, divide by r^2 (r = .85 m) and i get 1.03 x 10^25Thanks!
  4. Z

    Motion of a Charged Particle in an Electric Field

    Homework Statement A proton moves at 4.50 x 108 m/s in the horizontal direction. It enters a uniform vertical electric field with a magnitude of 9.60 x 103 N/C. Ignoring any gravitational effects, find (a) the time interval required for the proton to move 5.00 cm horizontally, (b) its vertical...
  5. Z

    Is Coulomb's Law the Correct Equation for This Calculation?

    Yeah okay I was thinking about that and that makes sense. And yeah I misunderstood the question. I thought they meant each person was an arms length away so the total distance between them was 2 arms lengths so i used 2(0.75) and 2(1.0) With that info, I got 6.10 x 10^61. Which is way too high
  6. Z

    Is Coulomb's Law the Correct Equation for This Calculation?

    Homework Statement Nobel laureate Richard Feynman once said that if 2 persons stood at arm's length from each other and each person had 1% more electrons than protons, the force of repulsion between them would be enough to lift a "weight" equal to that of the entire Earth. Carry out an...
  7. Z

    Is this Series Convergent or Divergent Using Comparison Tests?

    so then because 2(4/6)^n is convergent, the original series is convergent, correct?
  8. Z

    Is this Series Convergent or Divergent Using Comparison Tests?

    Homework Statement I have to determine whether the given series is convergent or divergent using the comparison tests: \sum from n = 1 to infinity of (n + 4n / (n + 6n) Homework Equations If bn is convergent and an \leq bn then an is also convergent liimit of an/bn as n goes to...
  9. Z

    Thermodynamics, two engine device

    thank you i got it now. one question though: how do you know to multiply the ratios? as far as i understand, it gives you the efficiency for Qc2 / Qh1 so that would be like the energy input from the first engine to the energy output of the second engine so it would be the efficiency for the...
  10. Z

    Thermodynamics, two engine device

    assuming that Qc1 = Qh2, e1 = 1 - Qc1/Qh1 e2 = 1 - Qc2/Qc1 Qc1/Qh1 = e1 - 1 Qc2/Qc1 = e2 - 1 multiplying them, i get e1e2 - e1 - e2, which is -1 times the answer I am trying to show. why is this?
  11. Z

    Thermodynamics, two engine device

    Homework Statement Suppose you build a two-engine device with the exhaust energy output from one heat engine supplying the input energy for a second heat engine. We say that the two engines are running in series. Let e1 and e2 represent the efficiencies of the two engines. (a) The overall...
  12. Z

    Solving Argon's Turbine Expansion Problem

    Ohhhhh okay I think I get it now. Thanks
  13. Z

    Solving Argon's Turbine Expansion Problem

    Which is equal to the ratio of the final and initial pressures?
  14. Z

    Solving Argon's Turbine Expansion Problem

    well for an adiabatic expansion i know that PiVi^y = PfVf^y where y = cp/cv, but i don't know the final and initial volumes so how does that help?
  15. Z

    Thermodynamics: adiabatic processes

    haha hey, yeah i found another site that had a bit of an explanation to it, but it didn't have c) or d) to it. thanks
Back
Top