Collections of physics problems - good idea?

AI Thread Summary
Starting graduate school brings concerns about qualifying exams, prompting discussions on effective study resources. Collections of physics problems, both with and without solutions, are considered valuable for exposure to diverse problem types across various concentrations. Specific recommendations include "Princeton Problems in Physics with Solutions" and "University of Chicago Graduate Problems in Physics, with Solutions," both praised for their quality and usefulness in preparing for qualifiers. Other noteworthy titles mentioned are "200 Puzzling Physics Problems," "Physics with Answers: 500 Problems and Solutions," and "Physics by Example: 200 Problems and Solutions." Overall, these problem collections are viewed as beneficial tools for study and practice.
dicerandom
Messages
305
Reaction score
1
I'll be starting grad school next year, and I'm already starting to worry about the qualifier ;) While poking around on Barnes & Noble's site I noticed that there are whole books which are just collections of problems in physics, with and without solutions. I thought that these might be a good way to get started studying for the qualifier, just so that I can expose myself to a wide variety of problems from different concentrations and work my way through them. I found a number of books, most of which were linked to off of other books I was looking at, and I'm wondering what everyone's opinions are.

Are these collections of problems a good way to get started studying for the qualifier? Are there any particularly good books in this area? How good are the ones I've listed?

Here are the books I was looking at:

  • Princeton Problems in Physics with Solutions, ISBN 0691024499
  • University of Chicago Graduate Problems in Physics, with Solutions, ISBN 0226121097
  • 200 Puzzling Physics Problems: With Hints and Solutions, ISBN 0521774802
  • Physics with Answers: 500 Problems and Solutions, ISBN 0521483697
  • Physics by Example: 200 Problems and Solutions, ISBN 0521449758
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both the Princeton and Chicago books are worth the money. I used both for my qualifiers way back when...
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
17K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top