What is the surface parametrization for rotating y=Cosh(x) about the x-axis?

chaotixmonjuish
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
I'm having problems understanding surface parametrization from differential geometry.

We are given two general forms for parametrization:
\alpha(u,v) = (u,v,0)
and x(u,v)=(u,v,f(u,v))


This is one I'm especially stuck on:

y=Cosh(x) about the x-axis

\alpha(u,v)=(u, Cosh[v],0)

x(u,v) = (u, Cosh[v]cos(u), Cosh[v]sin(u))

I think that's right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not understand the notation in these "general forms". Which textbook are you using?
 
hi chaotixmonjuish! :smile:

(have an alpha: α and a theta: θ :wink:)
chaotixmonjuish said:
y=Cosh(x) about the x-axis

\alpha(u,v)=(u, Cosh[v],0)

x(u,v) = (u, Cosh[v]cos(u), Cosh[v]sin(u))

are you talking about the surface of revolution obtained by rotating y = coshx about the x-axis?

if so, if one of your parameters (u) is equal to x, then the other sensible paramter to choose would be θ, an angle round the x-axis …

(so you'll get a nice "square-ish" (x,θ) grid on the surface)

anyway, your y will always be cosh(u), won't it, not cosh of some other parameter v ? :wink:
 
Hello! There is a simple line in the textbook. If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##. Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##. Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard. Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective...
Back
Top