What Forces are Involved in a Tennis Ball Pitching Machine Design?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing an automatic tennis ball pitching machine using two spinning wheels as the launching mechanism. The initial exit velocity of the ball is calculated to be 33.398 ft/s, and the required wheel RPM is determined to be 1299.36. The main challenge is calculating the forces acting on the ball while in contact with the wheels to determine the necessary torque and motor selection. It is suggested that the energy transferred to the ball during launch should be analyzed, rather than focusing solely on the forces, to ensure the wheels maintain sufficient speed. The conversation also touches on the potential for varying wheel speeds to create different spins on the ball.
minnicaj
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to design a automatic tennis ball pitching machine for my senior design project. I will be using two spinning wheels as the launching mechanism. So far I've found the initial velocity after the ball leaves the two spinning wheels (v = 33.398 ft/s). This velocity was found by using the equation R=v^2 sin⁡2θ. Right now I'm having trouble figuring out the forces while the ball is in contact with the two rotating wheels.

One rotating wheel:
Diameter - 6 inches
weight - 1.5 lbs
circumference = 1.57 ft

Tennis ball:
weight: 0.026 lbs
diameter: 2.7 inches

So far the equation I've been using to try and solve this is:
mv_1+∑▒〖∫_(t_1)^(t_2)▒Fdt=mv_2 〗

My professor told me I need to find the forces involved while the ball is in contact with the two wheels so I can calculate the torque needed and select a motor.

Also I've found the rpm's that the wheels would need to be spinning for the ball to have the exit velocity needed to be 1299.36 rpm.

I've also added a picture trying to illustrate my problem and what I've done so far.

Thanks in advance for any help!
 

Attachments

  • visual depiction pitching machine.jpg
    visual depiction pitching machine.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 3,057
Physics news on Phys.org
You'd have to make some fairly rough approximations to get a decent estimate of the force. However, I don't think that's really needed. With wheels of reasonable mass, the energy to launch the tennis balls will come from the stored kinetic energy of the wheels, not directly from the motor. So, a better analysis would be to determine how much energy is transferred to the tennis ball during launch, and then calculating how much the wheels will slow down in the process. If the analysis shows that the wheels will slow down too much, then increase the mass of the wheels until it is not a problem. Once that analysis is done, the motor can be selected based on the mass of the wheels.
 
how could I calculate how much energy is transferred to the ball during the launch? Can I accomplish this through equations and calculations or would I need to actually purchase parts and test this to get more data?
 
On some of these "pitching" machines the wheels can rotate at different speeds, in order to put a spin on the ball. There are table tennis machines that also use two wheels, but sometimes spins one of the wheels backwards (with the other going forwards much faster) in order to generate a lot of spin. I don't think you can get that amount of spin in tennis though, so just a difference in speed (as opposed to opposite spinning) would be enough to give top spin and back spin (slice).
 
would like to see the final design of your http://www.sportsmachineshop.com/" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top