Rearranging equations-need clarifying & pointing in the right direction (long)

  • Thread starter Thread starter rose22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on rearranging equations to calculate the temperature increase of water from a waterfall drop of 365 m. The key equations involved are ΔEk = 1/2 mv², W = mgh, and q = mcΔT. The user has derived the velocity of the water and attempted to relate it to the temperature change using energy conservation principles. The consensus is that all potential energy lost converts into heat, leading to the equation ΔT = gh/c, where ΔT represents the temperature change. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding energy conservation in the context of potential and kinetic energy transformations.
rose22
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Rearranging equations-need clarifying & pointing in the right direction! (long)

1. For an assignment question, I need to rearrange equations to find the temperature increase of a waterfall, specifically energy that has been turned into internal heat of the water. The height of the drop is 365 m. Mass of water is 1,000 kg (though the question states answer can be found without it). There isn't any net transfer of energy between mass of water & kinetic energy gained in the fall.



2. Equations that I've used so far:
ΔEk = 1/2 mv2
W = mgh

g = constant

I know that I need to use q = mcΔT




3. So far, this is what I have done:

(rearranged from 1/2 mv2 = mgh)

v = √2gh
v = 2 x 9.8 x 365 = 7154 (7 x 103)
√7154 = 84.58 = 85

Then, I did:
(rearranged from q = mcΔT)

ΔT = q divided by mc
85 / 1000 x (4.2 x 103) = 357

Is this about right? How can I put the 3 equations together, or are they alright like that?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


q is in fact an energy. It is the energy gained. Do it symbolically first and then insert your values.
How can you insert the velocity in the heating equation ?
You can find the decrease in potential energy which is equal to the gained kinetic energy and then the temperature. Maybe like this:
dE = 0 <=> T = V <=> T = mgh
And plug that into the T = mgh = q = mc dt <=> gh = c dt <=> dt = gh/c
Hope that i understood the problem.
 


i think i understand, but where does the 0 come in?? so, with T = mgh, is that deltaT?

so putting the equations together would result in:

T = mgh = dt = gh/c ?
 


The T stands for kinetic energy, the V potential dE in- or decrease in energy.
The zero is because the energy is conserved(Or all potential energy turns into kinetic/Heat). I think something is missing in the question if it isn't right. The way i understand it is: All potential energy lost turns into heat and hence:
V = mgh = mc\Delta T\\<br /> \Delta T = \dfrac{gh}{c}
Where the capital T is temperature.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top