How Does Na2CO3 Remove Impurities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jsmith613
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impurities
AI Thread Summary
Na2CO3, or sodium carbonate, is effective in removing impurities by acting as a base to neutralize excess acids, including HBr. The discussion highlights that SO2, an acid anhydride, can react with basic solutions, indicating its role in the purification process. Bromine, noted as a strong oxidizing agent, can oxidize sulfite in alkaline conditions, leading to more stable products. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the reaction conditions, particularly the separation from acids during the purification of distilled products. Overall, sodium carbonate's role as a base is crucial in this chemical context.
jsmith613
Messages
609
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



attachment.php?attachmentid=152542&d=1338376811.png


Why is the answer D??

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


So I know that Na2CO3 is used to remove excess acid but surely only HBr is the acid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SO2 is an acid anhydride, so there would be nothing strange in the fact it reacts with a basic solution. However, there is more to it. Bromine is a strong oxidizing agent, and in the alkaline solution it can easily oxidize sulfite (known reducing agent) to something much more stable.
 
Borek said:
SO2 is an acid anhydride, so there would be nothing strange in the fact it reacts with a basic solution. However, there is more to it. Bromine is a strong oxidizing agent, and in the alkaline solution it can easily oxidize sulfite (known reducing agent) to something much more stable.

but the conditions are acidic?
 
During reaction, but we are talking about purification of a distilled product, don't we?
 
Borek said:
During reaction, but we are talking about purification of a distilled product, don't we?

oh so it has been separate from acid
and therefore the sodium carbonate is the base? right?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top