Pulleys and Mass becoming infinitely large

  • Thread starter Thread starter puma7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Pulleys
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 100kg man and a 50kg mass connected by a pulley. The first part of the problem, which was solved, calculated the tension in the rope. The second part raises the question of the man's acceleration as the mass becomes infinitely large, with initial thoughts suggesting infinite acceleration. However, it is clarified that regardless of the mass's increase, the man's acceleration cannot exceed gravitational acceleration (g), leading to the conclusion that it approaches g as the mass approaches infinity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of analyzing the problem from different perspectives to understand the underlying physics better.
puma7
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is 2 problems that continue one another; I solved the first one but do not understand the second.

Homework Statement


A 100kg man dangles a 50kg mass from the end of a rope. If he stands on a frictionless surface and hangs the mass over a cliff with a pulley, the tension in the rope will be: (Note: Ignore any frictional forces) [SOLVED]

In the question above, as the mass becomes infinitely large, the man's acceleration becomes:
A. 5m/s2
B. 10m/s2
C. 20m/s2
D. infinite

Homework Equations


F = ma


The Attempt at a Solution


The solution to the first problem:
50g = (50+100)a
a = g/3 ~ 3.33
T = mass of man (a) = 100(3.33) = 333N

For the second problem:
Now the acceleration is directly tied to the mass of the block, so when it becomes infinite, I think the acceleration should be infinite.

However, in the answers it says: "B is correct. No matter how large the mass gets, its acceleration can never be greater than g, because it is gravity that is acting on it. Of course, the man will not be accelerated faster than the mass."

They go on to repeat this method again in the next problem. I don't really understand how the man's acceleration would still be finite with a block of infinite mass.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
puma7 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution to the first problem:
50g = (50+100)a
a = g/3 ~ 3.33
Good.
T = mass of man (a) = 100(3.33) = 333N
Not good. Redo this.

For the second problem:
Now the acceleration is directly tied to the mass of the block, so when it becomes infinite, I think the acceleration should be infinite.

However, in the answers it says: "B is correct. No matter how large the mass gets, its acceleration can never be greater than g, because it is gravity that is acting on it. Of course, the man will not be accelerated faster than the mass."

They go on to repeat this method again in the next problem. I don't really understand how the man's acceleration would still be finite with a block of infinite mass.
Forget the rope and the 50 kg mass for a second. If the man just dropped, what would be his acceleration? If his mass doubled, what would change? What if he were 1000 kg, not 100 kg?

Instead of trying to do it 'in your head', just redo your first calculation with increasing mass and see what happens. Make his mass first 100 kg, then 1000 kg, then 10000 kg. See the pattern.
 
If the man just dropped, then mg = ma and a = g. I see how acceleration will approach g as the mass goes to infinity now.

Doc Al said:
Not good. Redo this.

What do you mean redo this? If you do it from the perspective of the block, then
mg - T = ma
T = mg - ma = 50(10 - 3.33) = 333N
 
puma7 said:
If the man just dropped, then mg = ma and a = g. I see how acceleration will approach g as the mass goes to infinity now.
Cool.
What do you mean redo this? If you do it from the perspective of the block, then
mg - T = ma
As applied to the block, that equation has a sign error. The tension and acceleration are both upward.
 
Mg-T=Ma
T=ma

a=(\frac {M}{M+m}) g

M>>m, M+m≈M
 
azizlwl said:
Mg-T=Ma
T=ma

a=(\frac {M}{M+m}) g

M>>m, M+m≈M
Your second and third equations are incorrect.

But I agree that the best way to see the answer is to solve it symbolically and let M → ∞.
Why not let the OP solve it?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top