2-node Frame FEM element thermal formulation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the thermal formulation for a 2-node frame element in 3D space, specifically addressing the stiffness matrix and the incorporation of thermal loading. The user seeks confirmation on the correct formulation of the thermal coefficients matrix, which includes additional coefficients contributing to the right-hand side of the equation KxU=F. It is noted that a uniform temperature rise does not induce bending, and a thermal gradient is necessary for such effects in frame elements. The correct load vector for thermal expansion is derived, emphasizing the need to apply axial loads to counteract the expansion caused by temperature changes. The importance of subtracting thermal strains before calculating element stresses is also highlighted.
Ronankeating
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
\inthi all,

I need just little bit of confirmation about what I'm doing.

Normally I know how the stiffness matrix is composed for 2 node frame element in 3D space. which creates 12x12 matrix for that element, if there is also thermal loading on frame element additional coefficients(Q12x1 matrix) will contribute to the RHS of KxU=F equation.

Q=TRANSPOSE(\begin{bmatrix}Px1&0&0&0&-My1&Mz1&-Px2&0&0&0&My2&-Mz2\end{bmatrix})
where
Px = E*A*\alpha*ΔT
My = \int \alpha*E*ΔT*z*dA
Mz = \int \alpha*E*ΔT*y*dA

Is this the correct formulation of 3D frame elements thermal coefficients matrix?

Frame stiffness matrix works flawlessly, but if I introduce the Q on the right side of linear equations I always get the wrong solutions. The process itself is so simple but couldn't spot what I'm doing wrong.

Your help will be appreciated,

Regards,
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A uniform temperature rise in a beam element will not create any bending. To bend the beam you would need a thermal gradient from one side to the other. That is sometimes included in thermal loading of plate elements, with heat flowing through the thickness of the plate, but it doesn't sound very relevant for a building frame element.

The "simple" way to derive the loads is consider what happens to an element without any external loads or restraints. It will expand by an amount ##\alpha L \Delta T## where ##L## is the length of the element. To force it back to its original length, you need to apply axial loads ##F## and ##-F## at the two ends, where ##F = K \alpha L \Delta T##.

The axial stiffness ##K = EA/L##, so ##F = EA \alpha \Delta T##.

The load vector, in the element coordinate system, is
##Q = \begin{bmatrix} F & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -F & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}##.
(Warning, Q might be minus the above, but that's easy enough to check with a test problem.)

Remember you also need to subtract the thermal strains before you calculate the element stresses!
 
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Thread 'Where is my curb stop?'
My water meter is submerged under water for about 95% of the year. Today I took a photograph of the inside of my water meter box because today is one of the rare days that my water meter is not submerged in water. Here is the photograph that I took of my water meter with the cover on: Here is a photograph I took of my water meter with the cover off: I edited the photograph to draw a red circle around a knob on my water meter. Is that knob that I drew a red circle around my meter...
Back
Top