Does Dark Energy Repel Light and Cause Damage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alext180
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark energy Light
AI Thread Summary
Dark energy does not repel light or cause damage; it is primarily responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe. This expansion is a result of a curvature constant in spacetime geometry, rather than a mysterious energy that interacts with light. The effect of dark energy on light is minimal, contributing only a slight redshift over vast timescales. The expansion rate is extremely small, approximately 1/140 of one percent every million years. Overall, dark energy does not have dynamic effects on light or physical objects.
alext180
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
If dark energy repels things at the speed of light, does that mean if light energy is produced near it, it would repel it so hard and fast that it could actually damage things with a light beam? Basically what I'm asking is does dark energy repel light and if so could the light beams damage things?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
alext180 said:
If dark energy repels things at the speed of light, does that mean if light energy is produced near it, it would repel it so hard and fast that it could actually damage things with a light beam? Basically what I'm asking is does dark energy repel light and if so could the light beams damage things?

It hasn't been shown to actually be an energy, Alex. So the name is a bit misleading. What seems to fit the observations best so far is simply a curvature constant that appears in the GR equation. A very small residual curvature that is inherent in spacetime geometry. Not necessarily resulting from any mysterious "energy". Over the past couple of years some scientists have started preferring to call it "vacuum curvature" instead of "dark energy".

I can tell you the exact curvature if you want to know, it is measured in units of inverse area.
A curvature is the reciprocal of an area ("one over" some area expressed in square kilometers or square lightyears). So a very tiny built in curvature corresponds to a very big area. That is just how the Cosmological Constant happens to be expressed mathematically---it's a constant curvature.

It contributes to expansion and expansion is what stretches wavelengths and redshifts light, but this expansion is very very slight, only 1/140 of one percent every million years. And the inherent curvature has contributed so far only a fraction of that!

Otherwise the Cosmo curvature Constant does not affect light! It is very un-dynamic. Not a big deal. So you would not expect it to deflect light or cause physical effects like that.

I agree in general with what Drakkith said just now.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...
Back
Top