Considering a short parabolic impulse as direct current?

AI Thread Summary
A short parabolic impulse of one polarity cannot be treated as direct current in a circuit due to the nature of reflections, which require changes in signal value over time. Ordinary formulas for reflections are not applicable to DC analysis. Instead, the discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the impulse response of the circuit. This can be achieved through direct measurement or by analyzing the frequency response and applying a Fourier Transform. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately analyzing voltage waves in such scenarios.
freddyfish
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to consider a short (20ns) impuls of only one polarity as a short segment of direct current in a simple circuit where the reflections are to be analyzed? If not, how should I treat this kind of voltage waves?

The voltage is obviously not constant, but I wonder if it is possible to use ordinary formulas for reflections etc.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can't discuss reflections in terms of DC. The essential point about a reflection is that there is a change, in time, in value of the signal - i.e. it's there because of non-DC components of the signal.
You need to be thinking in terms of the Impulse Response of your circuit, which you can obtain either directly or by measuring the frequency response (including phase information) and then a Fourier Transform.
 
Thank you very much! Very good answer. :)
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top