How the Greenhouse Gas Effect works

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of the greenhouse gas effect, explaining how greenhouse gas molecules absorb and re-radiate infrared energy from the Earth's surface. It details a process where energy emitted to space and back to the Earth's surface reaches an equilibrium, with the power radiated to space converging to 235 Watts, equal to the solar energy received. The analysis uses the Stefan-Boltzmann Law to establish a relationship between the surface temperature of the Earth and the temperature at the top of the atmosphere, concluding that the Earth's surface temperature is approximately 18.9% higher than the atmospheric temperature. A key point raised is that while a constant volume of greenhouse gases prevents a runaway greenhouse effect, the potential for such an effect exists if positive feedback mechanisms are introduced, such as increased temperatures leading to more greenhouse gas dissociation. This highlights the complexity of climate dynamics and the importance of feedback loops in understanding climate change.
AEBanner
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
How the Greenhouse Gas Effect Works

We all know by now that the greenhouse gas effect depends upon absorption by greenhouse gas molecules of infrared energy radiated from the Earth’s surface, and which is then re-radiated by these molecules in all directions. Effectively, half the energy is emitted to outer space, and half is emitted to the Earth’s surface where it is absorbed again. Together with the additional energy continually being received from the Sun, this warms the surface more than would be the case without the GHG, and so causes increased radiation from the surface.

Consider an area of 1 square metre of the surface, and let us take a value of 235 Watts for the power incident upon this area. Assume an emissivity of 1.0 for the atmosphere. Follow the process through second by second as in the table below.

Sun’s radiation to____Surface radiation____Back radiation____Radiation to
Earth’s surface(W)___to atmosphere(W)___to surface(W)_____space(W)

235________________235_______________117.5___________117.5
235________________352.5______________176.25__________176.25
235________________411.25_____________205.625_________205.625
235________________440.625____________220.3125________220.3125
235________________455.3125___________227.65625_______227.65625
235________________462.65625__________231.328125______231.328125
235________________466.328125_________233.1640625_____233.1640625
235________________468.1640625________234.0820313_____234.0820313
235________________469.0820313________234.5410156_____234.5410156
235________________469.5410156________234.7705078_____234.7705078
235________________469.7705078________234.8852539_____234.8852539
235________________469.8852539________234.942627______234.942627
235________________469.942627_________234.9713135_____234.9713135
235________________469.9713135________234.9856567_____234.9856567
235________________469.9856567________234.9928284_____234.9928284
235________________469.9928284________234.9964142_____234.9964142
235________________469.9964142________234.9982071_____234.9982071
235________________469.9982071________234.9991035_____234.9991035
235________________469.9991035________234.9995518_____234.9995518
235________________469.9995518________234.9997759_____234.9997759


We see that the radiation to space converges towards 235 Watts, which in fact is the limit set by the power received from the Sun since, in equilibrium, the power emitted must equal the power received.

Also, the power radiated to the atmosphere converges towards 470 Watts, which is twice the power emitted from the atmosphere to space. Now, the power radiated from a body is proportional to the fourth power of the absolute temperature, by the Stefan-Boltzmann Law.

Let Ts be the absolute temperature of the Earth’s surface.
Let Ta be the absolute temperature of the top of atmosphere.

Therefore, we have
( Ts )^4 = 2 × ( Ta )^4

and Ts = (2)^0.25 × ( Ta)

Finally, Ts = 1.189 × Ta

That is, the surface temperature of the Earth is 18.9% greater than the temperature of the GHG emitting to space. This will be true provided that there is at least sufficient greenhouse gas present to be able to cope with the amount of energy being received from the Sun.

Note that this analysis can be applied to other planets which have an atmosphere containing at least sufficient greenhouse gases, like Venus. It also means that there cannot be a runaway greenhouse gas effect, because the ToA temperature is governed by the emission which must be equal to the energy received from the Sun, and the surface temperature is limited to twice the ToA temperature. This reasoning, of course, assumes that no energy is entering the atmosphere from other sources, such as geothermal energy, and it assumes an emissivity of 1.0 for the atmosphere.

Aubrey E Banner
Sale, Cheshire, UK
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
You're missing the point entirely, AE. You're correct that if the volume of greenhouse gas is constant, there will be no runaway greenhouse effect. Let me be the first to say: DUH! That's not what a runaway greenhouse effect is!

If the concentration of greenhouse gases is constant, then there is no feedback path, and the Earth will simply reach equilibrium. The actual temperature of that equilibrium will depend on the amount of greenhouse gas present.

However, if there's a positive feedback path involved -- say, higher temperatures lead to more dissociation of water in the upper atmosphere, leading to less dissolved greeenhouse gas, leading to higher temperatures, leading to more dissociation of water, etc. -- then you have a runaway greenhouse effect.

Your naive "analysis" totally neglects the feedback path that makes a runaway greenhouse effect a runaway in the first place.

- Warren
 
chroot

Please refer to my post "Greenhouse Gas Effect and Carbon Dioxide".

AEBanner
 
I don't need to refer to any other posts to show that your statements here are wrong.

- Warren
 
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
These last days, there is a seemingly endless cluster of rather powerful earthquakes close to the islands of Santorini, Amorgos, Anafi, and Ios. Remember, this is a highly volcanically active region, Santorini especially being famous for the supervolcanic eruption which is conjectured to have led to the decline of the Minoan civilization: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minoan_eruption To grasp the scale of what is happening, between the 26th of January and the 9th of February, 12000...
Back
Top