Equivalent Capacitance question

AI Thread Summary
To find the equivalent capacitance in a circuit with both series and parallel capacitors, first identify which capacitors are in series and which are in parallel. Capacitors in series require the inverse formula for combining capacitance, while those in parallel can be added directly. In the discussed problem, C1 and C2 are in series, and their equivalent capacitance is combined with C3, which is in parallel with the resultant capacitor. The final equivalent capacitance calculated is 6.71 picofarads. Understanding the arrangement of capacitors is crucial for accurate calculations.
kankerfist
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I have learned how to find equivalent capacitence when capacitors are in series and when they are in parallel, but I came across a problem where I'm confused about the capacitors:
confused.jpg

Normally I first find equivalent capacitence of parallel capacitors by adding them together. Then use the formula for finding the equivalent capacitence for capacitors in series. I am not sure exacty how to define the above capacitors though, which ones are parallel (able to be added together) and which ones are in series (inverses are able to be added together)?

The answer that my book provedes is: C eq = 6.71 picoferads

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this question I would find the equivalent capacitance of C1 and C2 (as they are in series) and combine them into a single capacitor (C4); and then treat it is as if C4 and C3 were two single capacitors in parallel. Does that make sense?
 
That does make sense! Thanks
 
kankerfist said:
That does make sense! Thanks
My pleasure.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top