Calculate Mass Without Scale - Using Cars & Momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter elitespart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
To calculate an unknown mass without a scale, one can use a meter stick, stopwatch, and two known mass cars. By creating a balance with the meter stick, placing one car on one side and the unknown mass on the other, the distances from the fulcrum can help determine the unknown mass based on the known weights. Incorporating friction into the calculations can complicate the process, but focusing on the conservation of momentum in elastic collisions can provide additional insights. The method effectively utilizes basic physics principles to achieve the desired measurement. This approach demonstrates a practical application of balance and momentum concepts in physics.
elitespart
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
If you were give an uknown mass and told to find it's mass w/out using a scale, how would u go about doing it. You have a meter stick, stopwatch, and 2 cars (which you can mass) w/ flat surfaces so you can put the unknown weight on it. I want to use the conservation of momentum in elastic collisions to figure out the unknown mass, but how would I go about incorprating the friction into it? any other info. would also be very helpful. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you know weight (and therefore the mass) of the cars, just make your own balance with the meter stick. Use the stopwatch as the fulcrum, and put one car on one side and the unknown mass on the other side. Use the relative distances when balanced to tell you the unknown mass.

That was easy. :rolleyes:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top