Calculate Interference in thin films

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the minimum thickness of magnesium fluoride on flint glass for destructive interference, the wavelength of light in the layer must be determined using the formula λ2 = n1 * λ1 / n2. With n1 as 1.38 and n2 as 1.66, the wavelength in magnesium fluoride is calculated to be approximately 398 nm. For destructive interference, the required thickness is λ2/2, resulting in a thickness of about 199 nm. The confusion arises from the need to account for phase shifts at the boundaries due to differing refractive indices. Accurate calculations are essential to achieve the correct thickness for the desired interference effect.
samdiah
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the minimum thickness of a layer of manesium flouride(n=1.38) on flint glass (n=1.66) in a lens system, if light wavelength 5.50x10^2 nm in air undergoes destructive interference.

Given:
n1=1.38
n2=1.66
λ1=5.5*10^2 nm

Homework Equations



Δx=L(λ/2t)
n2/n1 = λ1/λ2


The Attempt at a Solution



Destructive interference is at λ/4, 3λ/4, 5λ/4 ...

So the λ in flint flass is λ2=(n1*λ)/n2
= 4.57 * 10^-7

Therefore the shortest thicknss should be λ/4
4.57*10^-7/4
1.14*10^-7

The answer however is wrong the answer is suppose to be 199 nm.

Can someone please help! Thanku
:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
samdiah said:

Homework Statement



Calculate the minimum thickness of a layer of manesium flouride(n=1.38) on flint glass (n=1.66) in a lens system, if light wavelength 5.50x10^2 nm in air undergoes destructive interference.

Given:
n1=1.38
n2=1.66
λ1=5.5*10^2 nm

Homework Equations



Δx=L(λ/2t)
n2/n1 = λ1/λ2

The Attempt at a Solution



Destructive interference is at λ/4, 3λ/4, 5λ/4 ...

So the λ in flint flass is λ2=(n1*λ)/n2
= 4.57 * 10^-7

Therefore the shortest thicknss should be λ/4
4.57*10^-7/4
1.14*10^-7

The answer however is wrong the answer is suppose to be 199 nm.

Can someone please help! Thanku
:confused:

The interference is between the incident wave at the air (n1=1) and wave reflecting from the first layer (n2=1.38). Because the second layer has a higher index of refraction, the reflection at the first/second layer surface has a phase shift of \pi. So in order to have destructive interference (a phase difference of \pi), the path length through the first layer to the reflecting surface and back to the air has to be a full wavelength. So the thickness has to be \lambda_2/2.

The wavelength in the magnesium fluoride layer is \lambda_2 = n_1\lambda_1/n_2 = 5.5\times 10^{-7}/1.38 = 3.98\times 10^{-7}m = 398 nm

AM
 
I get 99.6nm, not 199nm. Remember to use the n of air, not the flint glass.
 
Thank You!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top