Distances of electrons in the shell

  • Thread starter Thread starter dansphere
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons Shell
dansphere
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi people,
I'm wandering what the distances of the levels of the electron shell are relative to the centre of the atom. I was told there's a pattern and am investigating it.
Regards,
Dan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dansphere said:
Hi people,
I'm wandering what the distances of the levels of the electron shell are relative to the centre of the atom. I was told there's a pattern and am investigating it.
Regards,
Dan

Go check the concept of Bohr radius. Just one thing : in the reference, they are not talking about any atom but a very specific one :wink:

Keep in mind that you need to look at these results using the correct "eye". In QM, you have this little thing called the uncertainty principle that does NOT allow for you to be talking in terms of the orbit, distnace, velocity of a particle like you do in classical physics ! Also, beware of the fact that the Bohr Orbit model is NOT the complete picture. Check out our FAQ in the General Physics subforum for more indept info.

regards
marlon


marlon
 
The average distance of any shell from the nucleus is roughly given by
r=n^2 hbar^2/mZ'e^2, where Z' is an effective Z, given by
Z'=Z-N, where N is the number of electrons in lower closed shells.
If you want SI, multiply by fourpiepsilonzero.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top