Storing an Image with a Single Photon: Quantum Mechanics at Work

DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,892
Reaction score
7,931
These guys are storing whole images using a single photon!

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070119094254.htm

I didn't think too much of the article until I read how they're doing it. It is pretty much living, breathing proof of QM's basic, weirdest principle.

"To produce the UR image, Howell simply shone a beam of light through a stencil with the U and R etched out. Anyone who has made shadow puppets knows how this works, but Howell turned down the light so much that a single photon was all that passed through the stencil.

Quantum mechanics dictates some strange things at that scale, so that bit of light could be thought of as both a particle and a wave. As a wave, it passed through all parts of the stencil at once, carrying the "shadow" of the UR with it. "
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How do they get so much info back out? Do they pass the single photon through a gain medium afterwards?
 
That wouldn't make sense, since a gain medium can only amplify information, I don't think it can actually write info in...

Anyway, even though I read about the double slit experiment, I don't fully understand it, so I'll leave this to the experts :)
 
cesiumfrog said:
How do they get so much info back out? Do they pass the single photon through a gain medium afterwards?
The image is not retrieved from a single photon. The picture is made up of
many photons gathered by a scanning single photon detector.

The proof that the image information was available in the wave-function of
the photon comes from a separate high intensity beam experiment which
shows clearly visible interference.

The point they make is that they can slow down the propagation to 1/300th
of the speed of light while retaining both phase and amplitude information.
Here is a description of the experiment on the web page of the authors:http://www.science.rochester.edu/depts/physics/archives/physics_012207.html Regards, Hans
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top