Infinite wires with current, magnetic field vector

AI Thread Summary
To determine the magnetic field vector at point A due to three infinitely long wires carrying current, it's essential to analyze each wire's contribution individually, considering their directions. The Biot-Savart law is applicable for calculating the magnetic field, and symmetry can simplify the process, particularly since the wires form a square configuration. The magnetic field at point A can be derived from the contributions of each wire segment, taking into account their respective distances and orientations. The right-hand rule is crucial for determining the direction of the magnetic fields. A thorough understanding of the integration process for the magnetic field from wire segments will aid in finding the net magnetic field at point A.
scholio
Messages
159
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



three infinitely long straight wires are arranged in a plane as shown at the left. what is the magnetic field vector at point A(see attach.)? all wires carry current I

Homework Equations



F = IL X B where x indicates cross product, I is current, L is length, B is magnetic field

magnetic field, biot-savart law, B = mu_0/4pi[integral(IdL/r^2)] where mu_0 is constant = 4pi*10^-7, dL is change in length, r is radius/distance, I is current

The Attempt at a Solution



not too sure about how to start, this is what i am thinking of:

first, determine the net magnetic field at the center of the triangle formed by the three wires, and then use the distance from the center of that triangle to point a, as value r in the biot-savart equation.

i have a feeling that since the problem asks for a vector, i need to analyze each wire individually based on their direction, is this a correct assumption?

help appreciated
 

Attachments

  • boxpath.JPG
    boxpath.JPG
    6.4 KB · Views: 554
Physics news on Phys.org
The wires actually follow the sides and diagonal of a square, which means we can take advantage of some symmetry for this (though not in an obvious way).

What you'll need to derive is the expression for the magnetic field at a point at a perpendicular distance r from the midpoint of a current-carrying wire segment of length L. You use Biot-Savart and the integration is symmetrical around the midpoint of the wire.

You would then use your result for three fields:

1) for the wire on the "vertical" side of the square, you use half your result for a point at a distance a from a segment of length a ;

2) for the "horizontal" side of the square, you use the same value as in (1) above ; and

3) for the diagonal, use the full field value for a point
a/sqrt(2) away from a wire of length a·sqrt(2), but with the field direction pointing the other way. (Use the right-hand rule for the three segments to see why the parts add this way.)

If the magnetic field for a wire segment is already derived in your book, you can just use it; otherwise, the integration isn't too bad...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top