Time delay for evanescent wave to spread (photon tunnelling)

EE.PHY.
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Nimtz and Stahlhofen claim that their recent tunnelling experiment proves that tunnelling time for light between double prisms is zero. In Herbert Winful's response to this (http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0709/0709.2736.pdf) he explains that the evanescent wave formed in the gap only has real propagation along the surface of the prism (not towards the second prism). He compares the gap to a cavity that holds energy, transverses the distance of the Goos-Hanchen shift, and then releases the energy simultaneously out of both sides of the gap. I have two questions..

1) It makes sense that after the evanescent wave fills the gap it is able to "leak" out energy into both prisms, but does it not take time for the evanescent wave to fill the gap? Why does this time not vary with gap length?

2) I have also read that this evanescent wave is a standing wave that oscillates, but it is not clear to me in which direction it oscillates? Does the waves move downwards due to the goos-hanchen shift and then another evanescent wave from new incident waves begins at the incident point periodically resulting in a standing evanescent wave moving up and down the goos-hanchen shift with time?

sorry for my ignorance this is all very new to me and I'm just trying to grasp what I can..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) The evanescent wave is able to fill the gap instantaneously because its amplitude decays exponentially with distance from the source. This means that for two prisms of a given separation, the wave will reach both prisms at the same time regardless of the length of the gap. 2) The evanescent wave oscillates in all directions. This means that when an incident wave hits the interface between the two prisms, part of the wave will be reflected and part will be transmitted into the gap. The transmitted wave will then oscillate in the gap and move towards the second prism. As the wave moves, it will encounter the Goos-Hanchen shift which will cause it to move laterally, resulting in a standing wave pattern in the gap. Thus, the wave will periodically move up and down the Goos-Hanchen shift with time.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top