Kinetic Energy/Circular Motion and figuring out point charges

AI Thread Summary
An electrically neutral model airplane flying in a horizontal circle breaks its guideline at 50J of kinetic energy, while the addition of point charges (+q and -q) increases the break point to 51.8J. The challenge lies in calculating the magnitude of the charges based on the change in kinetic energy and the forces involved. Initial calculations suggested a force of 1.2 N, but further analysis revealed the correct force to be approximately 7x10^4 N. The solution indicates that the charge magnitude is 3.5x10^-5 C, with the error stemming from an incorrect division during the calculations. Understanding the relationship between force and kinetic energy is crucial for solving similar problems.
succubus
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
For the life of me I can't seem to get this problem.

An electrically neutral model airplane is flying in a horizontal circle in a 3m guideline, which is nearly parallel to the floor. The line breaks when the Kinetic energy is 50J. Now, reconsider the same situation, except now there is a point charge of +q and -q on either ends of the guideline. The line now breaks when the KE is 51.8 J. Find the magnitude of the charges.

I tried relating v2 = Fr/m, and equating that to v2=2(KE)/m so Fr/m = 2(deltaKE)/m and got a force of 1.2 N. I figure I have to find the force before I can find the point charge, but I can't seem to find the force. When I worked backward from the solution, the force turned out to be around 7x10(4) N. Which makes more sense. What am I doing wrong?

Thanks for any help

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I completely agree with your derivation of the force change being 1.2N. What is the 'solution'?
 
The answer is 3.5x10(-5) C
 
I get that this charge corresponds to a force of about 1.2N at a distance of 3m. I think the problem is in the "working backwards" part.
 
I figured it out. I was dividing by two for some reason, and then realized I had to square root the answer. Thanks for your help :)
 
I actually am working on this exact problem and can't figure out what to do. Is there a possibility you could type out the steps of approaching this problem?? That would be great!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top