Problem understanding how a resistor limits current

AI Thread Summary
Resistors limit current flow in a circuit by providing resistance, which prevents excessive current that could damage components like diodes. In the discussed circuits, removing the load resistor (Rload) can lead to dangerously high current levels through the diodes, as they behave like short circuits when forward-biased. Resistor R1 is crucial because it ensures that the maximum current through the diodes remains within safe limits, even if the load is removed. If the load resistance is too low, it can drop the voltage at the junction below the required 1.8 volts to activate the diodes, preventing them from conducting. This mechanism protects the diodes from overheating and potential failure.
franceB
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am having problems understanding how a resistor resists or limits current flow (or electron flow).

http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/5595/currentquestionimage.jpg

In circuit 1, if I understand correctly the current at Point 1, Point 2 and Point 3 are all the same – that is if you measure the current at each of these three points you will get the same measurement.

Now to circuit number 2.
I got this circuit from
Scherz, Paul. (2000). Practical electronics for inventors. McGraw-Hill/TAB Electronics. Page 132
The caption that goes with the circuit is the following:

This circuit will supply a steady output voltage equal to the sum of the forward-biasing voltages of the diodes. For example, if D1, D2 and D3 are silicon diodes, the voltage drop across each one will be 0.6V; the voltage drop across all three is then 1.8 V. This means that the voltage applied to the load (Vout) will remain at 1.8V. R1 is desinged to prevent the diodes from “frying” if the resistance of the load gets very large or the load is removed.

Now my question is how does the resistor prevent the diodes from “frying” (or breaking down)? If Rload is removed from the circuit, I am under the impression that if you were to measure the current at Point 1, Point 2, Point 3, Point 4 and Point 5 that you will get the same measurement for current at each of these points. If this is so, how is the resistor preventing the diodes from frying?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Diodes more or less act like "short cuts" when used as in figure 2 This means that if you remove R1 the current flowing could be very large; potentially large enough to exceed the maxmum current rating of the diodes and fry them.
 
An ideal diode in forward bias mode is a short circuit. In other words it's like a wire. It doesn't have any resistance by itself to limit the current. If you you removed Rload then shorted pins 1 & 2, you would have a voltage (Vin) going through a wire with no resistance. I = V/R(0) = infinity. With R1 where it's supposed to be and Rload still removed, you would have a voltage (Vin) going through a resistor (R1). I = V/R(R1) = a finite value.
 
Last edited:
R1 is chosen so that the maximum current that could flow through the diodes does not exceed their maximum ratings.
This is never arranged to include the load if the load can be removed, because this would risk destroying the diodes.

Adding a load causes a reduction in this current through the diodes.

If the load causes the voltage at the junction of the two resistors to drop below the 1.8 volts required to turn on the diodes, then the diodes will not conduct. So, this sets a minimum value for the load resistance.

Diodes used as a voltage reference like this are not normally run with anything like their maximum current because the heating of the diodes will affect their terminal voltage.

For example, if the supply was 12 volts and R1 was 100 ohms, the maximum current that could flow would be 120 mA without the diodes. So, if the diodes were 1 amp diodes and they were put in series as shown, it would not matter what the load was, the diodes would not be in any danger.

If the load was 500 ohms, it would have 1.8 volts across it so it would be drawing 3.6 mA.
(1.8 volts / 500 ohms).
But the resistor R1 has 10.2 volts across it (12 - 1.8) so it is conducting 102 mA. (10.2 /100)

So there is 98.4 mA flowing in the diodes and 3.6 mA flowing in the load resistor.
If you removed the load resistor, the diode current would rise to 102 mA.

At no stage would the diodes be at any risk.
 
Thanks for the responses everyone.

I have a question about this:
vk6kro said:
If the load causes the voltage at the junction of the two resistors to drop below the 1.8 volts required to turn on the diodes, then the diodes will not conduct. So, this sets a minimum value for the load resistance.

How can/does the load cause the voltage at the junction to drop below 1.8 volts?
 
How can/does the load cause the voltage at the junction to drop below 1.8 volts?

In the above example, if the resistor R1 was 100 ohms and the supply was 12 volts, a load of 10 ohms would have 1.09 volts across it, by voltage divider action.

(ie (10 divided by (10 plus 100)) times 12 )

1.09 volts is not enough to make the diodes start conducting because this requires 1.8 volts, so the output voltage would be 1.09 volts.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top