Time it takes for a satellite to orbit the Earth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the time it takes for a satellite to orbit Earth in a near-Earth orbit, where gravitational acceleration is nearly constant. The relevant equations include gravitational force and centripetal acceleration, leading to the conclusion that the satellite's velocity can be derived from these relationships. A calculation error was identified when determining the satellite's velocity, initially yielding an incorrect value. After correcting the mistake by squaring the radius, the gravitational acceleration was found to be approximately 9.8 m/s², aligning with expected values. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations in orbital mechanics.
balletgirl
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine the time it takes for a satellite to orbit the Earth in a circular "near-Earth" orbit. The definition of "near-Earth" orbit is one which is at a height above the surface of the Earth which is small compared to the radius of the Earth, so that you may take the acceleration due to gravity as essentially the same as that on the surface. Does your result depend on the mass of the satellite?

M(earth)= 5.98x10^24 kg
R(earth)=6.38x10^6 m
G= 6.67x10^-11

Homework Equations



g= GM/r^2

FG= Gm1m2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure where to start since I don't know what equation to use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One more equation might help you. The satellite in orbit will have an acceleration equal to a = \frac{v^2}{r} which will equal Earth's gravity, g = \frac{GM}{r^2}

Setting those equal to each other, can you determine the velocity of the satellite and use that to find the period?
 
The gravitational force between the Earth and the satellite provides the centripetal force of the satellite. Are you able to make an equation?
 
Okay, I'm not sure if this is right, but here's my attempt:

I did v^2/r = GM/r^2
& plugged in:
V^2/(6.38x10^6) = (6.67x10^-11)(5.98x10^24)/(6.38x10^6)

and ended up with:
V= 1.99x10^7 m/s

when i plugged it into a=v^2/r i got a= 6.25x10^7

this doesn't seem right, isn't is suppose to be near 9.8 m/s?
 
You didn't square the radius on the right side.
 
Wow, dumb mistake...I redid it by squaring it and got 9.796 m/s. Thank you for your help!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top