Gravitational potential of two equal stars

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational potential of two equal stars, A and B, positioned 6r apart. The potential is expressed as the sum of the individual potentials from each star, leading to equipotential curves that are distorted but still resemble closed circles around each star. The participants discuss how to plot these curves and the specific potential values, emphasizing that the curves can be derived from the equation V(x) = 1/x + 1/(6-x). Additionally, there is a query about determining the minimum velocity for gas emitted from star B to be captured by star A, indicating the complexity of the problem. The conversation highlights the challenges in visualizing and calculating the equipotential surfaces in this two-star system.
benf.stokes
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two equal spherically symmetrical stars, A and B, each of mass M and radius r have their centers 6r apart. Make a sketch showing the lines on which the gravitational potential takes the values:
1. \frac{-10GM}{11r}

2. \frac{-2GM}{3r}

3. \frac{-GM}{3r}

Accurate plotting is not required but the general shape of the lines must be clear
4. What is the minimum velocity with which gas can be emitted from the surface of B and still be captured by A? Ignore any effects due to the motion of the stars

Homework Equations



U = \frac{-GM}{R}

The Attempt at a Solution



I can't even get started.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The potential of the double-star system is the sum of the potential of the single stars:
V=-GM(1/R1+1/R2),
where R1 is the distance from the star on the left and R2 is the distance from the star on the right. We can calculate the potential in -GM/r units, to make sketching equipotential curves easy.

In case of a lonely star, the equipotential curves are circles around the star. These circles will be somewhat distorted in the presence of the other star but they still are a pair of closed curves when we are at the close vicinity of one star.

It is easy to plot the potential values along the line which connects the stars. If the origin is the middle point between the starts, the potential function is V(x) = 1/x+1/(6-x) (multiplied by -GM/r). Drawing horizontal lines at the height of the given potential values, one can find the points where the equipotential curves cross the x axis.
In the middle, the potential of both stars is the same, the equipotential curves around both stars touch here. If the magnitude of the potential is lower than 2/3 the equipotential curve crosses the x-axis outside the two-star system, and encloses both stars.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • twostars.jpg
    twostars.jpg
    15.9 KB · Views: 502
Thanks for the help but isn't there any general way to determine the equipotential surfaces of the two stars? I happen to have the answer to the problem (I just can't figure it out) and it is like this:
solution.jpg
 
Look at the graph ehild has shown and simply look at it as though it were top-down.
 
You can calculate the equipotential curves, but it was not required.

For r=1, the equation for these curves is :

\frac{1}{\sqrt{(x+3)^2+y^2}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{(x-3)^2+y^2}}=C

But it is not easy to plot them.

ehild
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top