Conducting Rod in Electric Field

AI Thread Summary
When an uncharged metal rod is placed in a uniform electric field, it does not develop a sustained potential difference between its ends. Initially, there may be a brief potential difference due to charge redistribution within the conductor, but this quickly stabilizes. The charges rearrange themselves to eliminate any potential drop across the conductor, resulting in an internal electric field that cancels the external field. Consequently, the net electric field inside the conductor becomes zero, leading to no potential difference when integrated across its length. Thus, the potential difference remains effectively zero despite the presence of the external electric field.
Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
If an uncharged conductor, a metal rod say, is placed in a uniform electric field E, parallel to the field (see figure), does it develop a potential difference between its two ends?

If so, how is the potential difference related to the field E?
 

Attachments

  • Conductor_in_EField.JPG
    Conductor_in_EField.JPG
    4.5 KB · Views: 681
Physics news on Phys.org
Apteronotus said:
If so, how is the potential difference related to the field E?

By the definition, the electric potential, as the energy required to bring a point charge from point B to point A, is given by the negative integral of E over the distance dr from B to A. That is,
\int^{B}_{A}Edr
Just try to apply this on your case where A and B are different positions of the ends.
 
Well, if there is a potential difference, it will be very short lived. Since this is a conductor, the charge inside the conductor will re-arrange itself so that there is no potential drop across the conductor.
 
kcdodd said:
Well, if there is a potential difference, it will be very short lived. Since this is a conductor, the charge inside the conductor will re-arrange itself so that there is no potential drop across the conductor.

Yes I think you're right! And remember the concept of bound and free charges.
 
kcdodd said:
Well, if there is a potential difference, it will be very short lived. Since this is a conductor, the charge inside the conductor will re-arrange itself so that there is no potential drop across the conductor.

Actually, I'm not sure this is true. I've given the problem some thought since my original posting. I think a potential difference will in fact develop (and maintain) within the conductor. It's effect will be an electric field within such that the magnitude of the field will be equal to that of the imposed electric field (outside field) and will point in the opposite direction.

So the superposition of the two fields will be zero within the conductor.
 
Yes, the field will be zero within the conductor. So, if you do a line integral from one end to the other you will get zero for the potential difference.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top