Is Apostol's Calculus enough preparation for advanced physics studies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Physics
AI Thread Summary
Apostol's calculus texts are highly regarded for their thorough explanations of linear algebra and ordinary differential equations (ODEs), making them suitable for students planning to study physics, particularly quantum mechanics. The consensus is that the material covered in Apostol's Calculus II provides a solid foundation for understanding Griffiths's book on quantum mechanics. While Apostol's texts may not cover Fourier series and boundary value problems in depth, these topics are addressed in Griffiths's work, ensuring that students will not be at a disadvantage. Additionally, there is curiosity about the mathematical requirements for Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics," and some discussion about the necessity of the advanced level of mathematics presented in Apostol's Analysis for graduate school applications at institutions like Caltech. Overall, Apostol's texts are seen as adequate preparation for undergraduate physics studies.
Shing
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
Hi guys,
recently,
I am planning my college studies plan, majoring in Physics.

I would love to have a solid math background for my physics studies.
I am recently reading Apostol's calculus I.
And I found that actually Apostol's calculus I&II covers linear algebra and ODE,

so my question is:

1.) did Apostol do a good job at explaining LA & DE as well?
2.) Is Apostol's ODE in his Calculus II enough for me to read Griffiths's book on QM?

any other suggestions are welcomed =)

thanks for reading!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shing said:
Hi guys,
recently,
I am planning my college studies plan, majoring in Physics.

I would love to have a solid math background for my physics studies.
I am recently reading Apostol's calculus I.
And I found that actually Apostol's calculus I&II covers linear algebra and ODE,

so my question is:

1.) did Apostol do a good job at explaining LA & DE as well?
2.) Is Apostol's ODE in his Calculus II enough for me to read Griffiths's book on QM?

any other suggestions are welcomed =)

thanks for reading!

Apostol is an excellent text and does a very good job in explaining Linear Algebra. His exposition on Multivariable calculus will be more than enough to tackle Griffiths. You won't ever need to use concepts such as the 'winding number' any time soon. Go for it!
 
Thanks for replying, anirudh =)
 
I agree.

The coverage of linear algebra in Calculus II by Apostol is extremely good for physics, especially quantum mechanics. Likewise, the coverage of ODEs, multivariable and vector calculus is more than enough for undergrad physics. Griffiths's QM should certainly be doable with this background; most folks who take a class from that book likely have inferior backgrounds. The only piece that Apostol doesn't really cover that could be helpful for QM is Fourier series and boundary value problems, but Griffiths will teach you the main things you need to know about that anyway - it won't be bad with the Apostol background.

good luck,

jason
 
Thanks!

Besides, I would like to ask that how about Modern Quantum Mechanics by Sakurai? What math I will need for it?

And I would also want to ask
that Apostol's Analysis
I don't understand why Caltech's grad school requires that applcants have to be at the level of it, is it not totally unnecessary to have math at that precise level?
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top