What is a Hamiltonian vector field in General Relativity?

AI Thread Summary
A Hamiltonian vector field in General Relativity is a mathematical construct that describes the dynamics of a system in phase space, represented by pairs of generalized coordinates and momenta. It is derived from Hamilton's equations, which relate the time evolution of these coordinates and momenta to the Hamiltonian function. The vector field indicates the direction in which a particle will move in phase space, essentially guiding its trajectory. Understanding this concept requires a solid foundation in mechanics, as it connects to the physical behavior of particles. Clarifying the physical representation of the Hamiltonian vector field can enhance comprehension of its role in dynamics.
unchained1978
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I'm researching General Relativity and have stumbled upon a bit of Hamiltonian mechanics. I roughly understand the idea behind the Hamiltonian of a system, but I'm utterly confused as to what the hell a Hamiltonian vector field is. I've taken ODE's, PDE's, Linear Algebra, and I'm just being introduced to Differential Geometry so I can handle the math, but every article I read on this subject is entirely too abstract or jargon filled for me to understand. Can someone please explain to me what this vector field is and what it represents?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unchained1978 said:
I'm researching General Relativity and have stumbled upon a bit of Hamiltonian mechanics. I roughly understand the idea behind the Hamiltonian of a system, but I'm utterly confused as to what the hell a Hamiltonian vector field is. I've taken ODE's, PDE's, Linear Algebra, and I'm just being introduced to Differential Geometry so I can handle the math, but every article I read on this subject is entirely too abstract or jargon filled for me to understand. Can someone please explain to me what this vector field is and what it represents?
Please look at the example in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_vector_field and tell us what you don't understand.
 
When we're doing Hamiltonian mechanics we're in phase space and so have local coordinates q^i, p_i. What are Hamilton's equations? They're a 'list' of derivatives, and you could write it as:
<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \dot{q}^1\\<br /> \dot{q}^2\\<br /> ...\\<br /> \dot{q}^n\\<br /> \dot{p}_1\\<br /> \dot{p}_2\\<br /> ...\\<br /> \dot{p}^n\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}=<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \partial H/\partial p_1\\<br /> \partial H/\partial p_2\\<br /> ...\\<br /> \partial H/\partial p_n\\<br /> -\partial H/\partial q^1\\<br /> -\partial H/\partial q^2\\<br /> ...\\<br /> -\partial H/\partial q^n\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />
So, just like any ordinary vector field you've seen before, if you're at point 'm' it tells you where to go next to follow along the vector field. Differential equations are vector fields.

What's your background in mechanics?
 
Last edited:
Haven't taken any mechanics courses. I mainly don't understand what a hamiltonian vector field physically represents. Would the components be the velocities and forces of a particle or what? If someone could just give me an example it would go a long way. Thanks
 
unchained1978 said:
Haven't taken any mechanics courses.
Without a good understanding of mechanics it makes little sense to study general relativity. So you first need to improve your background.
unchained1978 said:
I mainly don't understand what a hamiltonian vector field physically represents. Would the components be the velocities and forces of a particle or what? If someone could just give me an example it would go a long way. Thanks
It is the vector field F(z) in phase space (whose points are the pairs z=(q,p)) that tells in which direction a particle at point z will move: zdot = F(z). Post #3 tells you more explicitly how F looks like, given the Hamiltonian.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top