Married couples - geometric distribution

AI Thread Summary
The couple's expected family size when having children until their first girl is calculated using the geometric distribution, yielding an expected value of 2. Each birth is an independent event with a 50% probability of being a girl. The discussion confirms that the geometric probability density function (pdf) is a reasonable model for this scenario, as it effectively captures the success-failure nature of the births. The probability of having n children before the first girl is indeed represented by the geometric distribution formula. Overall, the geometric model appropriately applies to this couple's situation.
irony of truth
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
A couple plans to continue having children until they have their first girl. Suppose the probability that a child is a girl is 0.5, the outcome of each birth is an independent event, and the birth at which the first girl appears has a geometric distribution. What is the couple's expected family size? Is the geometric pdf a reasonable model?

The expected value of a geometric dist. is 1/p = 1/0.5 = 2.

My problem is the 2nd question: from my point of view.. my answer is yes. Bec. the even only concerns w/ success-girl and failure-boy. Is my reason enough to say that gd. is the reasonable model? =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The probability that they will have n children (n >=1) is .5n. I presume that is a case of geometric distribution.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top