How Does the Equation F→∏ A l Z Relate to Fundamental Physics?

Thread starter phys-if
Start date May 8, 2012
Tags

Fundamental Fundamental physics Physics

AI Thread Summary

The equation F→∏ A l Z raises questions about its relevance to fundamental physics, particularly regarding the symbols used. The upside-down ∏ symbol and the tall line between A and Z are significant, as they represent a coproduct in mathematical terms. Understanding these symbols is crucial for interpreting the equation's meaning in a physical context. The discussion seeks to clarify how these mathematical concepts connect to physical theories. Overall, the connection between the symbols and fundamental physics remains a topic of exploration.

May 8, 2012

phys-if

I came across this. I guess you could say.

F→∏ A l Z ...or... F→∏ AlZ

The third symbol is supposed to be upside down. Does that matter?(The ∏ symbol)
And between the symbol A and Z the line is supposed to be a tall line. (Not an L or I)

Does this make sense?

Last edited: May 8, 2012

Physics news on Phys.org

May 8, 2012

phys-if

The ∏

Is supposed to be

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coproduct

May 8, 2012

Dead Boss

How is this physics?

Thread 'Need help understanding particle physics and quantum physics'

So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

View full post »

Thread 'Linear generator prototype'

i want to just test a linear generator with galvanometer , the magnet is N28 and the wire (Cu) is of 0.6mm thikness and 10m long , but galvanometer dont show anthing , The core is PLA material (3d printed) The magnet size if 28mm * 10mm * 5mm

View full post »

Thread 'Fundamental Probability'

If the universe is fundamentally probabilistic, and all possible outcomes are realized in some branch of the multiverse, does that invalidate the concept of scientific inquiry? If knowledge is merely a description of one particular branch of reality, does it have any inherent value?

View full post »