Best edition of Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the various editions of Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics," highlighting key differences among them. The main distinctions include the absence of the Magnetohydrodynamics chapter in the third edition, which is present in the first and second editions. The third edition predominantly uses SI units, while it reverts to Gaussian units in later chapters, a feature that some users appreciate for its relevance in physics. The third edition is noted for being more contemporary, particularly in its computational methods, reflecting advancements in electromagnetics since the earlier editions were published. Preferences vary, with some users favoring the second edition for its use of Gaussian units, which they consider superior for theoretical physics. Overall, the choice of edition may depend on individual comfort with units and specific content preferences.
d.zanellato
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello.

What's the best edition of Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics?


Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well first of all I'm not sure about what you mean by "the best edition". Second, I have not used formally Jackson for any of my EM courses (I'm still undergrad) but I've been through some parts of the book using its second and first edition. Many of the information that I will tell you is on the Introduction part of the 3rd edition.

You see, the main difference is that the 1st and 2nd have this chapter on Magnetohidrodynamics, which the 3rd edition doesn't contain. Then there's the issue with the units, the 3rd edition uses SI units for a large part of the book (unlike the earlier ones) but returns to Gaussian units in the last chapters (you may or may not find this a good thing, depending on which units you are more comfortable with, I think).

I don't remember everything that the Introductions mentioned but you can find them all three in the 3rd edition and then judge by yourself.
 
The 3rd edition is more up to date with respect to computational methods of calculating fields. The first two editions were written before computers were widely used in electromagnetics.

As for going back and forth in units, that is a skill that any physicist needs.
 
I liked the second edition best but that might be because I had it the longest. I did prefer the units in the third edition though. I do not remember why I did not like the third edition as much. I remember the first time I took the book out of the library it was the first edition. The second edition was red; the first was green, and the third was blue. I have even heard the books described as Jackson-Green; Jackson-Red, and Jackson-Blue.
 
For me it's the contrary. I like the 2nd edition best, because it uses Gaussian units. That's close to the perfect system of units, which is the Heaviside-Lorentz system, i.e., rationalized Gaussian units used in (theoretical) high-energy particle physics.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
50
Views
6K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Back
Top