Flux Trapping Effect: Magnetic Levitation & Suspension Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter cartik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux
cartik
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Magnetic suspension and levitation is the caused by the flux trapping effect in superconductors.How does this flux get "trapped"?

Another quick question-
We link a magnet to a superconductor by bringing it very close to one ,until both of them start attracting and repelling. My question is, if the magnetic field strength of this magnet is greater than the critical field of the superconductor,the superconductor will lose its properties and become normal, instead of demonstrating magnetic levitation and suspension ,right ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cartik said:
Magnetic suspension and levitation is the caused by the flux trapping effect in superconductors.How does this flux get "trapped"?

No, magnetic suspension/leviation is caused by the Meissner effect. Flux trapping is what makes magnets levitating over type II superconductors stable, if it wasn't for the trapped flux the magnet would fall off or slide to the side (it is possible to do this without trapped flux, even in type I systems, but it is very tricky to find a stable configuration).

The flux lines are trapped around impurties, gain boundaries etc. The math is quite complicated, but can be found in standard textbooks (see e.g. Tinkham)






Another quick question-
We link a magnet to a superconductor by bringing it very close to one ,until both of them start attracting and repelling. My question is, if the magnetic field strength of this magnet is greater than the critical field of the superconductor,the superconductor will lose its properties and become normal, instead of demonstrating magnetic levitation and suspension ,right ?

Yes, if the field is larger than the critical field the superconductor will just turn into a normal metal (or whatever the normal state is for that material).
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top