Is There a Way to Reverse Substitution in Finding Zeroes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pierce15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Substitution
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding intersections between the complex functions f(z)=e^z and g(z)=z, leading to the equation e^z=z. A substitution reveals that z=ln(z), allowing the equation to be rewritten as e^z=ln(z). The user is puzzled about reversing this substitution to find zeroes of the function i(z)=e^z-ln(z) back to h(z)=e^z-z. The conversation highlights the connection to the Lambert W function and emphasizes that there is no real number solution for the original equation e^z=z. The user ultimately seeks clarity on the concept of reverse substitution in this context.
pierce15
Messages
313
Reaction score
2
Hi guys... I'm probably missing something pretty basic here but I can't seem to figure this out. I was working on a problem recently: for the complex functions f(z)=ez and g(z)=z, find their intersections. This post is not about the problem, it is about something I noticed while tackling it (incorrectly).

Anyways, here's what I noticed: If you set these functions equal to each other, you get

ez=z

So, naturally:

z=ln(z)

From here I saw that a basic substitution was applicable, so the equation can be rewritten:

ez=ln(z)

Basically, what I have shown is that the function h(z)=ez-z has the same zeroes as the function i(z)=ez-ln(z). Now here's what's troubling me: what if the original problem that I gave you was to find the zeroes of i(z)? Originally, we obtained i(z) from h(z) by using a substitution, but is there some way that we can go in reverse from i(z) to h(z) using a "reverse substitution"? I'm sorry if this is rather unclear. Is there anything fundamental that I am missing?

Thanks a lot
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can do, pretty much any whacky thing you want because everything you do starts from the assumption that z is a real number such that e^z= z and there is NO such number.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You can do, pretty much any whacky thing you want because everything you do starts from the assumption that z is a real number such that e^z= z and there is NO such number.

Note that we are working with complex functions. By the way, I did find an answer to this problem, right now I am just thinking about reversing the substitution
 
pwsnafu said:
This is related to the Lambert W function.

pwnsnafu, like I said, I already solved the equation using the labert w function. Please read my first post carefully.
 
I guess this is kind of unclear. Here is the problem stated more clearly:

Prove that the system of f(z)=ez and g(z)=ln(z) has the same solutions as the system of f(z)=ez and h(z)=z
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top