Is Kleppner and Kolenkow's Mechanics Textbook Too Challenging for Beginners?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the difficulty level of the book "An Introduction to Mechanics" by Daniel Kleppner and Robert J. Kolenkow. Many participants agree that it is a solid choice for those with a background in mechanics and calculus, noting that it offers engaging problems that enhance understanding of key physics concepts. Comparisons are made with other texts, such as Goldstein's, which is considered more advanced and focused on Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics. While some find Kleppner's problems challenging yet enjoyable, others suggest that it is a significant step up from introductory texts like University Physics. Overall, Kleppner's book is recommended for self-learners looking to deepen their understanding of Newtonian mechanics.
miglo
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Can anyone comment on the difficulty level of this book? The one by Daniel Kleppner and Robert J Kolenkow.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521198216/?tag=pfamazon01-20
I've been thinking of buying it and studying from it, but reading the Amazon reviews has me thinking i should stay away from it, well at least for now.
I already know some mechanics from reading Young, Freedman, and Ford's University Physics, and my mathematics is up to differential equations and linear algebra.
I should add that although i do know some mechanics, I wasn't very good at solving the types of problems one can expect from taking a course in the subject.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
University Physics and Serway's Physics are Introductory Physics books.the kleppnar book is great for mechanics undergraduate course. I am a self-learner so I studied (due to lack of info) Goldstein before Kleppnar, and Kleppnar seems me very easy. If you already studied Univ. Phy then try Goldstein (level higher than Kleppnar's).
 
I found the problems in Goldstein to be much easier than those in Kleppner (the latter of the two was used by my teacher for our high school AP Physics C class). I also found the problems in Kleppner to be much more interesting than the comparable ones in Goldstein not to mention Goldstein is more intended for a more thorough treatment of lagrangian and hamiltonian mechanics (and other advanced topics of course) as a stepping stone to, say, a book on classical field theory. But yeah, all in all, the problems in Kleppner are very fun to work through and teach you many important techniques of physics that will come in handy. University Physics by Young is a joke in comparison to Kleppner and is much more dry in its presentation of the material. Kleppner's chapter on rigid body rotation, for example, is just plain awesome. Anyways, sorry for coming off as a Kleppner fanboy and good luck mate!
 
Kleppner/Kolenkow is the best mid level classical mechanics book you will find. You will need to know quite a bit of calculus to do the problems though. Since you have DEs and LA you should be fine though. If you plan on working on your own it's good choice even tough a challenging one.
 
It's good, but I would skip the special relativity sections.
 
I looked up Goldstein's book, and it seems to me that it takes the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian path to mechanics. I am actually looking for a book on Newtonian mechanics since i don't really like University Physics, plus Goldstein's book is over 100 dollars brand new and almost 100 for a used hardcover copy.
I think ill get Kleppner's book and later on try Goldstein, or maybe even Spivak's mechanics book.

Thanks everyone.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Back
Top