Does spacetime stand on its own?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vierstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacetime
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the nature of spacetime, questioning whether it exists as an independent entity or is instead a property of matter. It suggests that rather than matter residing within spacetime, spacetime could be a characteristic inherent to all matter. The conversation references current theories that posit spacetime as the framework for universal interactions, while also mentioning Mach's principle and its implications. A key point raised is the challenge of distinguishing between existing theories and alternative views on spacetime. The complexity of these concepts highlights the ongoing debate in physics regarding the fundamental nature of spacetime and matter.
Vierstein
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
The way I understood spacetime, we think of spacetime being its own entity, with which matter interacts, the way there is water in an aquarium wether there are fish or not inside it and the fish then interact with that medium.

Couldnt it be possible, that rather than spacetime being its own entity with matter residing in it, or matter being a consequence of spacetime, that it is the other way around, that spacetime is a proeprty that all matter has?

If that would not be the case, it would mean that matter could exist outside of spacetime. So is there a possibility that what we experience as the fabric of spacetime is really a spacetimefield, a property of all matter in the universe that interacts with each other?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Possibilities don't matter much. Just because we can conceive of something being a certain way doesn't have anything to do with whether or not it is actually that way. Current accepted theory states that spacetime is the framework that everything in the universe acts within. Ask yourself, is there any way to tell the difference between what you are asking and what we already describe it as?
 
Ok, this sounds like Mach's conception of space-time. One problem with Mach's principle is the rotating bucket of water, with nothing else in the universe. If there is nothing else in the universe, why does the water get pulled to the edges of the bucket? The bucket must be rotating relative to something else, some background space-time.

Check this out: ls.poly.edu/~jbain/philrel/philrellectures/11.InterpretingGR.pdf
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top