Spherical Aberration Explained - Chris' Experiments

AI Thread Summary
Spherical aberration in concave mirrors can cause blurry images on a screen, even when distant objects appear sharp when viewed directly. This discrepancy arises because the eye, acting as a small aperture, only captures a limited portion of the light cone, minimizing aberration effects. The discussion suggests that using a circular aperture in front of the mirror may enhance the clarity of the projected image. This principle mirrors camera behavior, where smaller apertures reduce lens distortion and improve depth of focus. Understanding these optical effects can clarify the differences in image quality observed in various viewing methods.
cavis
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
I'm having a little confusion regarding spherical aberration from some experiments I've been doing with a concave mirror. I've been directing the mirror so that it faces the distance (ie. objects at infinity) and then positioning a flat piece of paper so that an image forms on it. The image, even at is sharpest, remains somewhat blurry which is due to spherical aberration from the mirror, as far as I understand.

And yet, when I look at the distance directly in the mirror (without looking at the screen), I see an image that is perfectly crisp. What am I missing here?

Thanks in advance,

Chris.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the focal length, diameter, and F-Ratio of your mirror?

How far from the mirror are you placing your eye when you look in it? Very close to the focal plane, behind it, or in front of it?

It seems to me that your eye may only be getting part of the converging light cone from the mirror. If you take only a small piece of the light cone, the spherical aberration is greatly reduced.
 
cavis said:
Hi there,
I'm having a little confusion regarding spherical aberration from some experiments I've been doing with a concave mirror. I've been directing the mirror so that it faces the distance (ie. objects at infinity) and then positioning a flat piece of paper so that an image forms on it. The image, even at is sharpest, remains somewhat blurry which is due to spherical aberration from the mirror, as far as I understand.

And yet, when I look at the distance directly in the mirror (without looking at the screen), I see an image that is perfectly crisp. What am I missing here?

Thanks in advance,

Chris.
That's a very astute observation. I agree with Drakkith about the reason. When you look at the image directly, you are effectively putting a tiny aperture in the way (your pupil), which means that each part of the image you are looking at is coming from only a small part of the reflector and the errors are small.
In cameras, the lens distortions are always less and the depth of focus is always much greater when using a small aperture. You could try putting a circular aperture in the way of your mirror and see how the projected image improves.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top