Which Celestial Body in the Solar System Allows a Probe to Orbit Fastest?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining which celestial body in the solar system allows a probe to complete an orbit the fastest, emphasizing bodies with a diameter greater than 1000 km. It highlights that a smaller celestial body, like Tethys, is likely to provide a faster orbital period due to its reduced circumference. The conversation clarifies that the orbital period equation can be simplified by considering the probe's height above the surface as negligible. Participants suggest using gravitational and centripetal force equations to derive the orbital speed, which is essential for understanding the relationship between the radius of the celestial body and the orbital period. Ultimately, the discussion aims to identify the optimal celestial body for rapid orbital cycles based on these calculations.
Numeriprimi
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
Hello.
In my book with examples of astronomy, I found this: Calculate, around which the known celestial bodies in the solar system (with a diameter greater than 1000 km) do a probe one complete cycle fastest (without the use of engines). Other movements of these bodies is negligible.

If cycle must be fast, it must be a celestial body with small diameter (but greater than 1000 km). It is Tethys (1060 km) or something smaller?

It is true that the circulation period is equal to:

2 * π * (radius of celestial body + height probe above the surface) / speed the probe

It is good?

Sorry for my bad English.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This would probably fit better in the homework section, even though it's not exactly homework. You might try asking this kind of questions there in the future.


I assume you mean to calculate orbital velocity at minimal height - that is, as if the satellite were orbiting just above the surface, with no atmospheric drag, or mountains to worry about.
You want minimal height, because that's where the orbit is the fastest.

You want to find out how the orbital period changes with radius of the planet the probe is orbiting.

The equation for the period you've provided is indeed good, but you can drop the "height above surface" part, since we're trying to imagine it going around the planet/moon at zero height.

You still need to find out what is the speed, as it will not be the same for all bodies.

To do so, look up the force of gravity, and the centripetal force, and write an equation that compares them:
FG=Fc

solve for velocity.
The important bit is to express mass of the central body in terms of volume of a sphere and density.

Plug in the velocity to the equation for the period, and tell us what do you think it now tells you about the relationship between the radius and the period.
 
Smaller objects have a smaller circumference, but they also have a lower mass.

There is a nice relation between the time for an orbit and one specific, single parameter of the object. This allows to find the "best" one in our solar system.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...

Similar threads

Back
Top