Sum to Product Trigonometric identity does not work

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the validity of the sum-to-product trigonometric identity, specifically the equation sin(u) + sin(v) = 2 * sin((u+v)/2) * cos((u-v)/2). A user tested this identity with specific values and received a result close to zero, suggesting a potential failure of the identity. However, it was clarified that the discrepancy arises from rounding errors in the calculator's computations rather than an issue with the identity itself. The conversation also highlights the need for calculators to communicate their precision limits to avoid misleading results. Overall, the identity remains valid, but users should be aware of computational limitations.
CraigH
Messages
221
Reaction score
1
"Sum to Product" Trigonometric identity does not work

Hi,

The identity

sin(u) + sin(v) = 2 * sin (\frac{u+v}{2}) * cos(\frac{u-v}{2})
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trigonometric_identities#Product-to-sum_and_sum-to-product_identities

Does not always work. I put the equation :

(sin(u) + sin(v)) - (2 * sin (\frac{u+v}{2}) * cos(\frac{u-v}{2}))

With u equal to -4.1 and v equal to 99 into wolfram alpha and it gave me the answer -1.11022x10^-16
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=x%3D%28sin%28-4.1%29%2Bsin%2899%29%29-%28%282*sin%28%28-4.1%2B99%29%2F2%29*cos%28%28-4.1-99%29%2F2%29%29%29

If the identity is true, shouldn't the answer always be 0?

What's going on here?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It seems like a rounding error to me. You can verify that the identity is in fact always true by using the half angle and angle addition formulae.
 
The problem is not that the formula doesn't work, but with the fact that your calculator is incapable of precisely calculating the sine or cosine of an angle.
 
Ah okay, thank you for answering.
One thing though... If wolfram alpha knows that it can only calculate the sine or cosine of an angle to a certain precision, shouldn't it give the final answer to that precision, or less, so that it avoids giving misleading answers like the one it gave me.
 
CraigH said:
Ah okay, thank you for answering.
One thing though... If wolfram alpha knows that it can only calculate the sine or cosine of an angle to a certain precision, shouldn't it give the final answer to that precision, or less, so that it avoids giving misleading answers like the one it gave me.

It would be better if they did that. But I've never seen a calculator doing it. They rather count on the users to know about the fallibility of the program.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top