Arc length of a regular parametrized curve

AI Thread Summary
The arc length of a regular parametrized curve is defined as s(t) = ∫ from t_0 to t of |α'(t)| dt, where |α'(t)| represents the magnitude of the derivative vector. The derivative of arc length with respect to the parameter t is given by ds/dt = |α'(t)|, indicating that if the parameter t itself represents arc length, then ds/dt equals 1. This implies that when |α'(t)| = 1, the arc length simplifies to s = t - t_0. Clarification is needed if there is confusion regarding the conditions under which ds/dt equals 1. Understanding these relationships is crucial for working with parametrized curves in three-dimensional space.
tuggler
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Given t\in Ithe arc length of a regular parametrized curve \alpha : I \to \mathbb{R}^3 from the point t_0 is by definition s(t) = \int^t_{t_0}|\alpha'(t)|dt where |\alpha'(t)| = \sqrt{(x'(t))^2+(y'(t))^2+(z'(t))^2} is the length of the vector \alpha'(t). Since \alpha'(t) \ne 0 the arc length s is a differentiable function of and ds/dt = |\alpha'(t)|.

This is where I get confused.

It can happen that the parameter tis already the arc length measured from some point. In this case, ds/dt = 1 =|\alpha&#039;(t)|[/tex]. Conversely, if |\alpha&amp;#039;(t)| = 1 then s = \int_{t_0}^t dt = t - t_0.<br /> <br /> How did they get that it equals 1? I am not sure what they are saying?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Opps, I am in the wrong thread. How can I delete this?
 
tuggler said:
Given t\in Ithe arc length of a regular parametrized curve \alpha : I \to \mathbb{R}^3 from the point t_0 is by definition s(t) = \int^t_{t_0}|\alpha&#039;(t)|dt where |\alpha&#039;(t)| = \sqrt{(x&#039;(t))^2+(y&#039;(t))^2+(z&#039;(t))^2} is the length of the vector \alpha&#039;(t). Since \alpha&#039;(t) \ne 0 the arc length s is a differentiable function of and ds/dt = |\alpha&#039;(t)|.

This is where I get confused.

It can happen that the parameter tis already the arc length measured from some point. In this case, ds/dt = 1 =|\alpha&#039;(t)|[/tex]. Conversely, if |\alpha&amp;#039;(t)| = 1 then s = \int_{t_0}^t dt = t - t_0.<br /> <br /> How did they get that it equals 1? I am not sure what they are saying?
<br /> <br /> If t is arc length (that is: s = t), then ds/dt = 1. If this doesn&#039;t answer your question you need to elaborate.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top