Does formula exist for this sum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter db453r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the sum ∑_{i=1}^{n}[i/2^i], with participants exploring its formula. A correction was made regarding a similar sum, leading to clarification that the original sum is indeed ∑_{i=1}^{n} [i/2^i]. A user suggested using Wolfram Alpha, which provided a formula for the sum as 2^{-n}(-n + 2^{n+1} - 2). Additionally, a method involving an auxiliary function and differentiation was shared to derive the sum. The conversation highlights the usefulness of computational tools and mathematical techniques in solving complex series.
db453r
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
\sum_{i=1}^{n}[i/2^i]

Have looked and looked and cannot find it anywhere.

EDITED: To correct mistake.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
db453r said:
\sum_{i=1}^{n}[n/2^n]
That one's easy. There's nothing inside the sum that depends on i, so your sum is the same as ##\frac n {2^n}\sum_{i=1}^n 1##.

Do you mean ##\sum_{i=1}^n \frac i {2^i}## ?

Have looked and looked and cannot find it anywhere.
Have you tried Wolfram alpha, www.wolframalpha.com ?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Oops. Yeah, that's what I meant.
 
Wow. Didn't know Wolfram could do that. Thanks.

Here's what it gave me:

\sum_{i=0}^{n} i/2^{-i} = 2^{-n}(-n+2^{n+1} -2)
 
You can solve this by hand by using a neat trick.
Form the auxiliary function (*):
F(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{i=n}(\frac{x}{2})^{i}, that is, F(x) is readily seen to be related to a geometric sum, with alternate expression (**):
F(x)=\frac{1-(\frac{x}{2})^{n+1}}{1-\frac{x}{2}}-1
Now, the neat trick consists of differentiating (*), and we get:
F'(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{i=n}i*x^{i-1}2^{-i}
that is, we have:
F'(1)=\sum_{i=1}^{i=n}i*2^{-i}
which is your original sum!

Thus, you may calculate that sum by differentiating (**) instead, and evaluate the expression you get at x=1
:smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top