Is From Free Trade to Forced Trade by Peter Urmetzer worth reading?

  • Thread starter Thread starter student007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book trade
AI Thread Summary
"From Free Trade to Forced Trade" by Peter Urmetzer presents free trade as a neutral concept, emphasizing its potential benefits and drawbacks. The author argues that free trade, rooted in the principle of comparative advantage, enables countries to specialize in industries where they are most efficient. This specialization leads to overall economic benefits, such as lower prices and increased efficiency, as countries can focus on their strengths while importing goods that others produce more effectively. However, the book also acknowledges the negative consequences, such as job losses in certain industries, exemplified by the decline of the US steel industry. Ultimately, Urmetzer suggests that while free trade can enhance global economic dynamics, it also presents challenges that must be addressed.
student007
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Has anyone read "from free trade to forced trade" by Peter Urmetzer? I just finished reading it. It was a bit of an eye opener - it describes free trade as a neutral activity - not good or bad. Great book
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give some of the major points on why the author thinks this way?
 
I'm guessing the author is basically arguing for free trade based on the concept of comparative advantage. For example say you are a lawyer and have no secretary. You have the ability to type well, organize your schedule, etc. But wouldn't you be better off if you highered a secretary anyway? If you highered a secretary, you have more time and energy etc. to focus on being a better lawyer. This is sort of what comparative advantage is. Free trade supposedly allows everyone to be better off by allowing some countries (like the US) to focus being more efficient in certain industries, while allowing other countries to gain from exporting goods to that country (although that country could make those goods it imports). In the end, free trade should result in lower prices for everyone while increasing efficiency in certain industries and allowing other countries (poorer possibly) to benefit. There are some draw back such as certain industries not becoming efficient enough with their foreign counterparts resulting in lost jobs etc. (such as the US steel industry). This is why the author may be claiming trade as a neutral. It has its gains and drawbacks.
 
Last edited:
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top