How long does it take the object to reach the ground?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Signifier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ground
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for an object to fall from a height, considering both gravitational force and air resistance. For a simple model ignoring air resistance, the time to fall from height z0 is derived as t = √(2z0/g), yielding approximately 37.12 seconds from 6750 meters. The more complex model includes air resistance, leading to a terminal velocity calculation, but the user expressed confusion over their negative time result, indicating a potential error in their calculus. Other participants suggested breaking down the problem into two parts: the time to reach terminal velocity and the time to fall at that velocity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity and accuracy in physics calculations.
Signifier
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I just started physics a few days ago (with 0 prior experience) so I'm still queasy with this stuff. If anyone could help me with this problem, I'd really appreciate it.

Say I drop an object from a height z0. How long does it take the object to reach the ground? There are two frameworks to do this problem in, a simple framework and a more complex framework. I have answers for both, but I'm much more tentative about my answer for the complex framework.

Simply and ideally, we can assume the only force acting on the object is the gravitational field strength. Then the object's z position is given by

z(t) = -0.5gt^2 + V0t + z0

The initial velocity in the z-direction is 0, so

z(t) = -0.5gt^2 + z0

We want the time it takes for the object to fall from (x,y,z0) to (x,y,0). So we solve:

0 = -0.5gt^2 + z0
z0 = 0.5gt^2
2(z0) = gt^2
2(z0)/g = t^2
[2(z0)/g]^(1/2) = t

So, if I drop an object from rest at 6750 meters up and ignore everything but gravity, it would take about 37.12 seconds to reach the ground. (Am I right about this? Did I mess something up?)

Now, the more complex framework involves gravity and air resistance. I am unsure about my calculations here, because I had to derive everything myself and so things could be very wrong (I am basically feeling around in total darkness here, hoping to get something right). Anyway, the drag force acting on an object is given by Fd = 0.5CpAv^2 (I did not derive this, obviously!) where C is the drag coefficient, p is the desnity of the fluid (for air, p = 1.2 kg / m^3), A is the object's cross-sectional area, and v is the velocity at which the object is falling.

If I drop the object vertically from rest, the object's terminal speed (when it's no longer accelerating) would be when the force due to gravity is equal to the force due to air resistance (Am I right about this? Am I using the right terms?). The (magnitude of the?) force due to gravity is given by mg (Am I right about this!?). So

mg = 0.5CpA(vT)^2
2mg = CpA(vT)^2
2mg / (CpA) = (vT)^2

This would be the terminal velocity for the object (vT represents terminal velocity - sorry for the messy symbology!) Now if I play around with Newton's second law...

Fnet = ma = -mg + 0.5CpAv^2

That is, the net force on the object is the drag pushing it up and gravity pulling it down, if we restrict movement to only the z axis. To get the terminal velocity in there, I can rewrite this equation as:

ma = -mg + mg[CpA / (2mg)]v^2
ma = -mg + mg[1 / (vT)^2]v^2
ma = mg[-1 + (v^2 / (vT)^2)]

Now, to make the function nature more explicit...

a(t) = g[(v(t)^2 / (vT)^2) - 1]

This is the acceleration in the z axis at some time t. g and vT are constants, a(t) and v(t) are functions of time. I won't write down all the calculus after this part (I don't know how to show it on these forums), but basically

dv/dt = g[(v^2 / (vT)^2) - 1]
dv/[(v^2 / (vT)^2) - 1] = g dt
dv/[1 - (v^2 / (vT)^2)] = -g dt

Integrating both sides (the left from v(0) to v(t) and the right from 0 to t), I got

v(t) = (vT) tanh [(-gt)/(vT)]

Only one more integration to get to the position function! Integrating both sides with respect to t, this time indefinitely...

s(t) = -[(vT)^2 / g]ln [cosh[(-gt)/(vT)]] + C

At t = 0 in my model, the object should be at position (x,y,z0). So s(0) = z0, and

z0 = -[(vT)^2 / g]ln [cosh[0]] + C
z0 = 0 + C
C = z0

So the z-position function is

s(t) = -[(vT)^2 / g]ln [cosh[(-gt)/(vT)]] + z0

Now what makes me nervous is the negative sign in the cosh argument... Because eventually, this would lead to a negative number of seconds, which is nonsense. So I'm sure I messed up somewhere, either in my calculus or in my understanding of physics. That said, setting s(t) = 0 and solving for t:

[(vT)^2 / g]ln [cosh[(-gt)/(vT)]] = z0
g(z0) / (vT)^2 = ln [cosh[(-gt)/(vT)]]
e^[g(z0) / (vT)^2] = cosh[(-gt)/(vT)]

And so on (it's getting too messy to continue!). Anyway, let's return to that object I dropped from 6750 meters up. Let's just say it has a terminal velocity vT = 60 m / s (or we could say what its shape, mass and cross-sectional area is, and find vT that way). Using the stuff I derived, with gravity and air resistance acting on it, it looks like it would take -116.74 seconds to reach the ground from 6750 meters up. Now obviously, as I said, this is wrong (a negative second?), but assuming the problem is just in my calculus and a sign got mixed up in there, does the figure of ~ 117 seconds sound right? This is about pi times the original estimate that didn't factor in air resistance (I do not know why it is about pi times the original estimate, this frightened me deeply). Is that a bit too big? Or can air resistance have that significant an effect?

Sorry for posting so much disorganized junk - maybe in a few months my physics will be a bit more beautiful.

Thanks for any and all help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i don't mean to sound disrespectful, but i can not understand at all what you are saying. If you want help from this forum you will need to condense this problem down considerably, people on this forum don't have time to read through all of this, try and separate the question. and if possible write your equation better.

I will try and help if i can
 
to be more acurate g =9.81ms^-1
 
Okay, here's the super-condensed version.

How long does it take an object to fall from z0 meters to the ground if we ignore air resistance? (IE the only thing affecting the object's fall is gravity)

How long does it take an object with terminal velocity vT m / s to fall from z0 meters to the ground if we do not ignore air resistance? (IE both gravity and air resistance affect the object's fall)

= )

[BTW: to be even more accurate, g = 9.8076 m(s^-2)]
 
In physics we generally use g =9.81m/s^2 its been standard accuracy since GCSEs, A-levels, and University.

the first part is just using

t=(2s/a)^1/2

taken from s=ut+1/2at^2

where u is the intial velocity and s is the dispacement

the initial velocity is 0 hence s=1/2at^2

With the terminal velocity you will need to work it out in 2 steps I think

you will need to work out how long it takes to reach terminal velocity and then work out how long it takes to reach the ground at terminal velocity.

I think if we neglect air resistance we get

vT= sqrt(mg/A) where m is the mass and A is the crossectional area however you are not given any of these, so you will need to consider another equation.
 
Now, I haven't scrutinized your solution yet, but the negative sign within the cosh function is totally irrelevant, since cosh is an even function.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top