Diffraction limit on resolution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum aperture required for a spy plane's camera to achieve a resolution of 5.20 cm at an altitude of 25.3 km, using a wavelength of 550 nm. Initial calculations using the Rayleigh criterion led to an incorrect aperture size, prompting further analysis. The correct approach involves using the small angle approximation for theta and ensuring calculations are consistent in radians. Ultimately, the correct diameter of the camera lens is determined to be approximately 0.326 m. The conversation highlights the importance of consistent units and methods in optical calculations.
mrbling
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Q:Spy planes fly at extremely high altitudes (25.3 km) to avoid interception. Their cameras are reportedly able to discern features as small as 5.20 cm. What must be the minimum aperture of the camera lens to afford this resolution? (Use lambda = 550 nm.)

I first found theta.. .052m/2 = .026m (since .026 above and below the center = .052m)
tan theta = .026m/25300m, and theta = 4.578x10^-5

Then plugging into the rayleigh criterion for resolution limit of theta = 1.22lamda/D, where D is the diameter of the objective lens (same as aperture of camera??)... I get
theta = 1.22lamda/D
4.578x10^-5 = 1.22(550x10^-9)/D
D= .0147m, which is incorrect..

anyone know where I went wrong?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get d = .326m using
sin \theta = 1.22\frac{\lambda}{d}
and letting \theta = arctan \left( \frac{.052}{25300}\right)
so:
d = \frac{1.22x5.5x10^{-7}}{sin({arctan \left( \frac{.052}{25300}\right)})} = .326m

Not sure though. Do you know what the answer is supposed to be?
 
Gnome,
Your answer was the correct one. I tried your process earlier, but I think I was confusing the theta since it was given in radians as opposed to doing sin theta for the degrees..

Thanks!
 
You can get the same answer using the \theta=sin\theta small angle approximation, but then you have to be consistent & do the arctan calculation in radians also.

So \theta = arctan \left(\frac{.026}{25300}\right) = 2.0553x10^{-6}

and d = \frac{1.22x5.5x10^{-7}}{\theta} = .326 m
 
Gnome's answer in slightly more legible LaTeX:

gnome said:
You can get the same answer using the \theta=\sin\theta small angle approximation, but then you have to be consistent & do the arctan calculation in radians also.

So

\theta = \arctan \left(\frac{.026}{25300}\right) = 2.0553\times 10^{-6}

and

d = \frac{1.22\times 5.5\times 10^{-7}}{\theta} = .326\,\mbox{m}
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top