Laurent series for f(z) = 1/(exp(z)-1)^2 ?

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
Laurent series for f(z) = 1/(exp(z)-1)^2 ??

Homework Statement



Determine the Laurent series and residue for f(z) = \frac{1}{(e^{z} - 1)^{2}}.

Homework Equations



We know that the Taylor series expansion of e^{z} is = 1 + z + (z^2)/2! + ...

The Attempt at a Solution



I am soooo confused. It's almost like a geometric series, except the denominator is squared. I know I need to use the Taylor series expansion, but I don't know where. Do I just invert the Taylor series expansion? How do I deal with the fact that it's squared?

I almost thought of writing it into the geometric series anyway, then squaring the terms (obviously this isn't really accurate, as I'd be missing tons of cross-terms, but if we only need a few terms of the series anyways...). Can anyone help to explain what's going on?

I understood the example in our book (there's only 1 example :frown:) but it had two different poles, and I was able to expand the Taylor series around the "other" pole for each Laurent series. Here our only pole is 0 (though of order 2) and I don't know how to proceed.
Any help would be so appreciated! :cool:
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You expand around z=0. exp(z)-1=z+z^2/2!+...=z(1+z/2!+...). Write that as z(1+a) where a=z/2!+z^2/3!+... So 1 over that squared is (1/z^2)*(1/(1+a)^2). The series expansion for 1/(1+a)^2 is 1-2a+3a^2+... As you said, you only need the first few terms. Now start throwing away terms that you know won't contribute to the terms you need. E.g. a^2 starts with a z^2 term.
 


oh,oh, that is SOOO Nice!

IT WORKED! :smile:

I think this has helped me a LOT. You use the Taylor series to simplify your expression into a form that you can expand in geometric/other series, because it's a lot simpler than doing the nasty line integral for the coefficients? Basically we just put this into a different looking form, and then it all stood out.

I even got the same answer as Maple, up to the first 5 terms! :biggrin:

Thank you Dick!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top