[Q]Momentum eigenstate normailization

  • Thread starter Thread starter good_phy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenstate
good_phy
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi

I use liboff quantum mechanics textbook fourth edition.

5.25 fomula of 122 page is \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{ikx}

I thought it is nomalized, but i don't know exactly why \sqrt{2\pi} is denominator.

I think it seemed to be linked Dirac-delta function \int_{\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2\pi}e^{i(k-k^{&#039;})x} = \delta(k-k^&#039;)[/atex] but i have no idea what is going on exactly.<br /> <br /> Please Help me<br /> <br /> Thank for reading this question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is because of his definition of Fourier transform. Different people use different conventions. In the end, they are all equivalent of course and should give the same results.

See, for example this link ("Other conventions" section).
 
Thank you so much that i found Fourier transform is included general innerproduct

in some mathematical space as l Fourier transform is just analogous to vector

innerproduct between momentum eigenfunction and statefunction. thank you.

but i have one questiong. what is hilbert space in which general vectorproduct is

defined?
 
good_phy said:
but i have one questiong. what is hilbert space in which general vectorproduct is defined?

What do you mean by general vector product?
 
It means innerproduct such as &lt;\varphi_{k}|\varphi{_{k^&#039;}}&gt; i described

product of this form as more general form of 'vector innerproduct in normal vector space'
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top