Is there a rule of thumb for small angle approximation?

AI Thread Summary
The small angle approximation (Sin Theta = Theta) is generally valid for angles within the range of approximately -0.105 to 0.105 radians, as indicated by textbooks. When no specific error level is provided, it's advisable to determine an acceptable error margin personally and use calculus to evaluate the approximation's accuracy. The Taylor remainder theorem can help bound the error, but for small angles, analyzing the alternating series of the Taylor series for sine is often simpler. A practical guideline suggests that angles less than 0.5 radians are typically acceptable for very rough calculations. Visualizing the graph of Sin x / x can further clarify the regions where the approximation holds true.
Starwatcher16
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
When you are not given an acceptable level of error in a problem, is there any rule of thumb I should use for how large Theta can be before I stop using the small angle approximation(Sin Theta=Theta) ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
According to my textbook it says (to 3sf, in radians)

-0.105<\theta<0.105
 
Starwatcher16 said:
When you are not given an acceptable level of error in a problem, is there any rule of thumb I should use for how large Theta can be before I stop using the small angle approximation(Sin Theta=Theta) ?
Decide for yourself what level of error is appropriate. Then use your calculus to determine if that approximation is good enough!

The Taylor remainder theorem is a systematic way to bound the error on an approximation.

However, when theta is small, the Taylor series for sin is an alternating series whose terms are strictly decreasing -- so an easier method is to use what you know about alternating series to estimate the error.
 
In general if you're doing really simple and very very approximate calculations then anything less than 0.5 would probably be just fine.

Truly though, the best way to look is to see a graph of Sin x / x. Analyze this and look at the regions where it is 0.95 - 1 for example, and you can then grasp where you can begin to approximate.

About x = 0.55 is where Sin x / x = 0.95. Obviously as x goes to 0, the value increases towards 1.

I hope that helped or at least made you get up and get your graphing calculator :P
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top