Find the PDF of W when W= X + Y + Z. Random Varibles, Uniform Distrubutions.

Dwolfson
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1. Let X , Y and Z be independent random variables, uniformly distributed on the interval
from 0 to 1. Use Theorem 3.8.1 twice to find the pdf of W = X + Y + Z .

Thm. 3.8.1 States: If X & Y are continuous random varibles wth pdfs fx(x) and fy(y), respectively then

fw(w)=\int^{INF}_{-INF} fx(x)fy(w-x) dx

Homework Equations



When setting up the problem I understand how to do it once.. I set S=X+Y and get the PDF of s to be a piece wise defined function:

Keep in mind that I am completely unsure of my bounds of integration -- I do not have any idea if these bounds are correct -- But I tried to use my best logic and intuition to figure them out.

PDF of s = s when 0\leqs<1
PDF of s = 2-s when 1\leqS\leq2

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured that there will be three intervals for the final solution:

0\leqw<1

1\leqw<2

2\leqw\leq3

Some of these may be strictly < or > but that is part of my confusion...

So my intuition tells me:

I should calculate:

\int^{W}_{0} S ds
Giving PDF of W = w^2/2 for 0\leqw<1

After this I am very lost:

I Imagine the interval from 1 to 2 will be the sum of two integrals... \int^{w}_{1} 2-S ds +
\int^{w-1}_{0} S ds
which gives : W+1 as the PDF ( I Think this is incorrect by the way).

I justified my bounds by this logic:

If S is between 0 and 1 we'd use the pdf(s) that = S meaning that if W is between 1 and 2 and S is between 0 and 1 we'd integrate from S=0 to S=w-1

If S is between 1 and 2 we'd use the pdf(s) that = 2-S from 1 to W becuase S has to be at least one and less than W.

For the third interval of W is between 2 and 3:

I used this integral:

\int^{w-1}_{1} 2-S ds

I justified my bounds by this logic:

Since W=X+Y+Z and S=X+Y S would have to be atleast 1 for this interval to make sense... Since if S=1 and Z=1 then W=2. The upper bound of this integral would be W-1 because if W is maximized at 3 then S would be 2. So for any number between 2 and 3 the upper bound is W-1.Thank You for your help,
-Derek
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
the solution:

f_w(w)=\begin{cases}<br /> \frac{w^2}{2} &amp; 0&lt;w\leq 1 \\<br /> -\frac{3}{2}+3 w-w^2 &amp; 1&lt;w\leq 2 \\<br /> \frac{1}{2} (-3+w)^2 &amp; 2&lt;w\leq 3 \\<br /> 0 &amp; \text{Everywhere } \text{else}<br /> \end{cases}<br />
 
Thanks... I like to work backwards.. now I can figure out the bounds.

Appreciated.
 
did you get it? need some more help?
 
I did eventually figure it out.. Thank you for the followup.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top