Help Needed: Solving Physics Problem with Zero Understanding

  • Thread starter Thread starter cubejunkies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Zero
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 2.00 kg block that falls 100 meters, with half of its lost potential energy converting to internal energy, affecting its temperature. The participant expresses frustration over a lack of understanding of key equations, specifically Q = mcΔt and Δke + Δpe + ΔU = Q - W, and seeks guidance on how to apply them. Responses emphasize the importance of problem-solving skills over mere equation application and suggest that understanding the concepts behind the equations is crucial. The participant is encouraged to derive the necessary relationships from the problem statement. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges of self-learning in physics and the need for foundational understanding.
cubejunkies
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
My teacher gave us this problem before break in a packet and we basically had to teach ourselves how to do problems like this, and unfortunately, I'm no natural at physics and I might only just have the right equation to apply to the problem yet I have absolutely no understanding of how to use the equation to solve the problem, and I don't even know if its the right equation at all. Basically: FAIL x 1000

The problem:

A 2.00 kg block has a specific heat of 115 J/ (kg x K). It falls from rest through a distance of 100.0 meters to the Earth's surface. If half of the potential energy lost by the fallen block when it hits is converted to internal energy of the block, what is the temperature change of the block?

I lied. I actually know of two equations to use, and they are Q = mcΔt and Δke + Δpe + ΔU = Q - W where W is work and U is the change in internal energy (?) But I have zero knowledge of how to use these eqns unfortunately.

If someone could even at least point me to a youtube video that would teach me this stuff, it would be as meaningful to me as a grand unifying theory's discovery would be to physics.

Thanks!
Anthony
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cubejunkies said:
My teacher gave us this problem before break in a packet and we basically had to teach ourselves how to do problems like this, and unfortunately, I'm no natural at physics and I might only just have the right equation to apply to the problem yet I have absolutely no understanding of how to use the equation to solve the problem, and I don't even know if its the right equation at all. Basically: FAIL x 1000

The problem:

A 2.00 kg block has a specific heat of 115 J/ (kg x K). It falls from rest through a distance of 100.0 meters to the Earth's surface. If half of the potential energy lost by the fallen block when it hits is converted to internal energy of the block, what is the temperature change of the block?

I lied. I actually know of two equations to use, and they are Q = mcΔt and Δke + Δpe + ΔU = Q - W where W is work and U is the change in internal energy (?) But I have zero knowledge of how to use these eqns unfortunately.

If someone could even at least point me to a youtube video that would teach me this stuff, it would be as meaningful to me as a grand unifying theory's discovery would be to physics.

Thanks!
Anthony

Your teacher may be trying to get you practice problem solving, rather than blindly plugging into equations.

The words above in red should allow you to come up with your own equation.

The change internal energy of the block will heat up the block, as given by Q = mcΔT.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top